Back

A tool for browsing the Cancer Dependency Map reveals functional connections between genes and helps predict the efficacy and selectivity of candidate cancer drugs

Shimada, K.; Muchlich, J. L.; Mitchison, T. J.

2019-12-18 cancer biology
10.1101/2019.12.13.874776 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Individual cancers rely on distinct essential genes for their survival. The Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) is an ongoing project to uncover gene dependency in hundreds of cancer cell lines. DepMap is a powerful drug discovery tool, but can be challenging to use without professional bioinformatics assistance. We combined CRISPR and shRNA screening data from DepMap and built a non-programmer-friendly browser (https://labsyspharm.shinyapps.io/depmap) that reports, for each gene, the growth reduction that can be expected on loss of a gene or inhibition of its action (efficacy) and the selectivity of this effect across cell lines. Cluster analysis revealed proteins that work together in pathways or complexes. This tool can be used to 1) predict the efficacy and selectivity of candidate drugs; 2) identify targets for highly selective drugs; 3) identify maximally sensitive cell lines for testing a drug; 4) target hop, i.e., navigate from an undruggable protein with the desired selectively profile, such as an activated oncogene, to more druggable targets with a similar profile; and 5) identify novel pathways needed for cancer cell growth and survival.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
7
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
8
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.3%
17
NAR Cancer
◐ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
19
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
○ 38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Cancer Research
● 130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
24
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.