Back

STING controls Herpes Simplex Virus in vivo independent of type I interferon induction

Yamashiro, L. H.; Wilson, S. C.; Morrison, H. M.; Karalis, V.; Chung, J.-Y. J.; Chen, K. J.; Bateup, H.; Szpara, M. L.; Lee, A. Y.; Cox, J. S.; Vance, R.

2019-12-13 immunology
10.1101/2019.12.12.874792 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) pathway initiates potent immune responses upon recognition of DNA derived from bacteria, viruses and tumors. To signal, the C-terminal tail (CTT) of STING recruits TBK1, a kinase that phosphorylates serine 365 (S365) in the CTT. Phospho-S365 acts as a docking site for IRF3, a transcription factor that is phosphorylated and activated by TBK1, leading to transcriptional induction of type I interferons (IFNs). IFNs are essential for antiviral immunity and are widely viewed as the primary output of STING signaling in mammals. However, other more evolutionarily ancestral responses, such as induction of NF-{kappa}B or autophagy, also occur downstream of STING. The relative importance of the various outputs of STING signaling during in vivo infections is unclear. Here we report that mice harboring a serine 365-to-alanine (S365A) point mutation in STING exhibit normal susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection but, unexpectedly, are resistant to Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)-1, despite lacking STING-induced type I IFN responses. Likewise, we find Irf3-/- mice exhibit resistance to HSV-1. By contrast, resistance to HSV-1 is abolished in mice lacking the STING CTT or TBK1, suggesting that STING protects against HSV-1 upon TBK1 recruitment by the STING CTT, independent of IRF3 or type I IFNs. Interestingly, we find that STING-induced autophagy is a TBK1-dependent IRF3-independent process that is conserved in the STING S365A mice, and autophagy has previously been shown to be required for resistance to HSV-1. We thus propose that autophagy and perhaps other ancestral interferon-independent functions of STING are required for STING-dependent antiviral responses in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.