Automatic Detection of Synaptic Partners in a Whole-Brain Drosophila EM Dataset
Buhmann, J.; Sheridan, A.; Gerhard, S.; Krause, R.; Nguyen, T.; Heinrich, L.; Schlegel, P.; Lee, W.-C. A.; Wilson, R.; Saalfeld, S.; Jefferis, G. S. X. E.; Bock, D.; Turaga, S.; Cook, M.; Funke, J.
Show abstract
The study of neural circuits requires the reconstruction of neurons and the identification of synaptic connections between them. To scale the reconstruction to the size of whole-brain datasets, semi-automatic methods are needed to solve those tasks. Here, we present an automatic method for synaptic partner identification in insect brains, which uses convolutional neural networks to identify post-synaptic sites and their pre-synaptic partners. The networks can be trained from human generated point annotations alone and require only simple post-processing to obtain final predictions. We used our method to extract 244 million putative synaptic partners in the fifty-teravoxel full adult fly brain (FAFB) electron microscopy (EM) dataset and evaluated its accuracy on 146,643 synapses from 702 neurons with a total cable length of 312 mm in four different brain regions. The predicted synaptic connections can be used together with a neuron segmentation to infer a connectivity graph with high accuracy: between 92% and 96% of edges linking connected neurons are correctly classified as weakly connected (less than five synapses) and strongly connected (at least five synapses). Our synaptic partner predictions for the FAFB dataset are publicly available, together with a query library allowing automatic retrieval of up- and downstream neurons.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards a More General Understanding of the Algorithmic Utility of Recurrent Connections 95%
- RETINA: Reconstruction-based Pre-Trained Enhanced TransUNet for Electron Microscopy Segmentation on the CEM500K Dataset 95%
- CNN MouseNet: A biologically constrained convolutional neural network model for mouse visual cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.