A Cognitive Development Chart for School-age Children and Adolescents
Simioni, A. R.; Pine, D.; Sato, J. R.; Pan, P. M.; Fonseca, R. P.; Schaefer, J.; Miguel, E. C.; Mari, J. d. J.; Gadelha, A.; Bressan, R. A.; Rohde, L. A.; Salum, G. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and predictive utility of a time-efficient cognitive development chart that seeks to identify children and adolescents with high-risk for multiple outcomes such as mental health problems, substance use, and educational difficulties. MethodWe analyzed data from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort for Psychiatric Disorders (HRC), a longitudinal school-based study conducted from 2010-2011 to 2013-2014. Participants were 2,239 children and adolescents, 6 to 17 years of age, who completed the cognitive assessment at baseline. The task used to track cognitive development was the Two Choice Reaction Time task (<3 minutes of duration, computer-based), which assesses the accuracy and speed of perceptual decision-making. Mental health, substance use, and educational outcomes were assessed by validated standardized methods. Key variables were measured at baseline and 3-year follow-up. The predictive utility was assessed using static (deviations from the age-expected performance at baseline) and dynamic (deviations from the age-expected change in performance over time) indicators. ResultsThe reliability of the task parameter was high (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.8). Static indicators of cognitive development significantly predicted concurrent mental, intellectual and educational difficulties, as well as incident and persistent educational difficulties and substance use in the 3-year follow-up. Dynamic indicators predicted persistent mental health problems. ConclusionPrimary-care and mental health professionals need a time-efficient tool for tracking deviations from age-expected cognitive development, which predicts multiple unwanted outcomes at the same time. If replicated, future results could support the generation of tools for tracking risk for mental health, substance use, and educational difficulties.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 93%
- “ A Man Never Cries ”: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Gender Differences in Depression and Alcohol Use in Moshi, Tanzania 92%
- Prevalence of Social Anxiety Disorder and its associated factors among Foreign-born Undergraduate Students in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 92%
- The relationships between experimental task and questionnaire measures of reward/punishment sensitivity in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): protocol for a scoping review 92%
- Evaluation on the Effectiveness on the Implementation of WHO-CST Programme in Hong Kong: A RCT Protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 94%
- Prediction of Adolescent Internalizing Disorder Risk: Evidence from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study 93%
- Mental Health Conditions in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Asexual Youth in Brazil: a call for action 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the Association Between Urinary Incontinence and Depression Based on a Series of Large-Scale National Health Studies in Turkiye 88%
- Chronic fatigue, depression and anxiety symptoms in Long COVID are strongly predicted by neuroimmune and neuro-oxidative pathways which are caused by the inflammation during acute infection 87%
- Biopsychosocial response to the COVID-19 lockdown in people with major depressive disorder and multiple sclerosis 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.