Back

The efficacy of DNA MMR enzyme immunohistochemistry as a screening test for hypermutated gliomas

McCord, M.; Steffens, A.; Javier, R.; Kam, K.-L.; McCortney, K.; Horbinski, C.

2019-11-15 pathology
10.1101/19012005
Show abstract

A subset of gliomas has DNA repair defects that lead to hypermutated genomes. While such tumors are resistant to alkylating chemotherapies, they may also express more mutant neoantigens on their cell surfaces, and thus be more responsive to immunotherapies. A fast, inexpensive method of screening for hypermutated gliomas would therefore be of great clinical value. Since immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2, Msh6, Mlh1, and Pms2 is already used to screen for hypermutated colorectal cancers, we sought to determine whether that panel might have similar utility in gliomas. MMR IHC was scored in 100 WHO grade I-IV gliomas with known tumor mutation burdens (TMB), while blinded to TMB data. Eight of 100 cases showed loss of one or more MMR proteins by IHC, and all 8 were hypermutated. Among the remaining 94 gliomas with intact MMR IHC, only one was hypermutated; that tumor had an inactivating mutation in another DNA repair gene, ATM. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 99%, 89%, and 100%, respectively. The strongest correlates with hypermutation were prior TMZ treatment, MGMT promoter methylation, and IDH1 mutation. Among MMR-deficient hypermutated gliomas, 50% contained both MMR-lost and MMR-retained tumor cells. Together, these data suggest that MMR IHC could be a viable front-line screening test for gliomas in which immunotherapy is being considered. They also suggest that not all cells in a hypermutated glioma may actually be MMR-deficient, a finding that might need to be considered when treating such tumors with immunotherapies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Modern Pathology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
Acta Neuropathologica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 64%
6.0%
5
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
5.4%
6
Journal of Clinical Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
5.2%
7
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 2%
4.8%
8
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 22%
2.9%
11
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
12
Blood Advances
based on 16 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
13
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
14
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
16
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 11%
1.6%
17
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
18
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 79%
1.3%
20
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Gastroenterology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Clinical Epigenetics
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 19%
0.7%
30
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 34%
0.7%