Back

Heterogeneity in prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a meta-analysis

Howard, R.; Kanetsky, P. A.; Egan, K. M.

2019-11-05 epidemiology
10.1101/19011387 medRxiv
Show abstract

High pre-treatment values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are strongly associated with poorer survival outcomes in cancer patients. Here, we assess heterogeneity in the magnitude of this association and the prognostic potential of the NLR between patient subgroups. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis of 228 published studies (N=75,555 patients) relating NLR with overall survival across 18 cancer types. Cochrans Q test and Higgins I2 statistic were used to assess study heterogeneity. Pooled hazard ratios were compared between groups of studies classified by cancer type, geographic region, therapy type, and cut-off for high NLR to identify study-level characteristics associated with increased prognostic potential of the NLR. Pooled hazard ratios are highest in studies of melanoma and breast cancer and lowest in studies of brain cancer and lung cancer. Radiation as primary treatment also demonstrates a large pooled effect size as compared to other therapies. The NLR has greater prognostic value in certain cancer types and therapeutic regimens. Efforts are needed to comprehensively examine populations in which NLR has maximum prognostic power. Clinically meaningful thresholds for risk stratification should be identified within these patient subgroups to permit prospective validation of the prognostic potential of the NLR.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.5%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
8
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
11
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
13
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
16
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%