An Environment-Wide Study of Adult Cognitive Performance in the 23andMe Cohort
Huang, Y.; Filshtein, T.; 23andMe Research Team, ; Gentleman, R.; Aslibekyan, S.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDWith the emergence of web-based data collection methods, large digital health cohorts offer the opportunity to conduct behavioral and epidemiologic research at an unprecedented scale. The size and breadth of such data sets enable discovery of novel associations across the phenotypic spectrum. METHODSWe deployed the digital symbol substitution test (DSST) online to consented 23andMe research participants 50-85 years of age. We tested cross-sectional associations between DSST performance and 824 phenotypes using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, age*sex interaction, device, time of cohort entry, and ancestry, separately among discovery (n=144,786) and replication (n=93,428) samples; additional analyses further adjusted for education. We post-stratified association estimates on age, sex, and education to adjust for discrepancies across subsamples. Leveraging the rich genetic and phenotypic data available at 23andMe, we also estimated genetic and environmental correlations between DSST and its top correlates using linkage disequilibrium score regression. RESULTS97 phenotypes were significantly (false discovery rate < 0.05) and strongly (standardized effect size > |0.5|) associated with DSST performance in the discovery phase. Of those, 60 (38 with additional adjustment for education) demonstrated both statistical significance and consistent direction of association in the replication sample. The significantly associated phenotypes largely clustered into the following categories: psychiatric traits (e.g. anxiety, {beta} per 1 SD = -0.74, P-value=3.9x10-169), education (e.g. highest math class completed, {beta} per 1 SD = 2.11, P-value<1 x 10-300), leisure activities (e.g. solitary activities like puzzles, {beta} per 1 SD = 1.85, P-value<1.0x10-300), social determinants (e.g. household income, {beta} per 1 SD = 1.20, P-value= 8.9x10-245, and lifestyle (e.g. years smoked, {beta} per 1 SD = -0.98, P-value= 2.2x10-78). We identified several reproducible genetic correlations between DSST and its top associated exposures (e.g. 0.48 for leisure activities like puzzles, 0.28 for years of education, and -0.24 for anxiety; all P [≤] 7.9x10-26). For almost all exposures, genetic correlations with DSST were considerably stronger than environmental correlations. CONCLUSIONSWe have conducted the largest study of cognitive performance to date, building evidence supporting its correlations with many social, lifestyle, and clinical exposures. We established that the observed associations are in part underpinned by shared genetic architecture. Our study illustrates the potential of large-scale digital cohorts to contribute to epidemiologic discovery.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses 93%
- Genetic correlates of socio-economic status influence the pattern of shared heritability across mental health traits 92%
- Genetic Consequences of Social Stratification in Great Britain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deciphering the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Brain Structure: Insights from Mendelian Randomization 93%
- Gene-environment correlation: The role of family environment in academic development 92%
- Pathfinder: A gamified measure to integrate general cognitive ability into the biological, medical, and behavioural sciences 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The associations of child screen time with psychiatric problems: the role of genetic confounding 92%
- Associations between socioeconomic status and white matter microstructure in children: indirect effects via obesity and cognition 91%
- Effects of exercise on brain health outcomes in children with overweight/obesity: the ActiveBrains randomized controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.