Back

Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin for traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Liu, M.; Wang, A. J.; Zhao, G.; He, H.; Williams, Z.; Hu, K.

2019-09-23 surgery
10.1101/19006601
Show abstract

ObjectiveRecent studies regarding the effects of erythropoietin (EPO) for treating traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been inconsistent. This study conducts a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of EPO for TBI patients at various follow-up time points. MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library for RCTs studying EPO in TBI patients published through March 2019. Non-English manuscripts and non-human studies were excluded. The assessed outcomes include mortality, neurological recovery and associated adverse effects. Dichotomous variables are presented as risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). ResultsA total of seven RCTs involving 1197 TBI patients were included in this study. Compared to the placebo arm, treatment with EPO did not improve acute hospital mortality or short-term mortality. However, there was a significant improvement in mid-term (6 months) follow-up survival rates. EPO administration was not associated with neurological function improvement. Regarding adverse effects, EPO treatment did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events or other associated adverse events. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates a slight mortality benefit for TBI patients treated with EPO at mid-term follow-up. EPO does not improve in-hospital mortality, nor does it increase adverse events including thrombotic, cardiovascular and other associated complications. Our analysis did not demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of EPO intervention on the recovery of neurological function. Future RCTs are required to further characterize the use of EPO in TBI.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 24%
17.5%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 0.4%
20× avg
3
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
103× avg
4
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
80× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 35%
5.2%
6
Journal of Neurotrauma
Mary Ann Liebert Inc · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
59× avg
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 5%
6.1× avg
8
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
9
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 5%
4.5× avg
10
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 3%
8.9× avg
11
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.9%
18× avg
12
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 34%
2.5%
13
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
14
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
7.4× avg
15
Neurobiology of Disease
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.6%
27× avg
16
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 13%
2.1× avg
17
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 7%
3.8× avg
18
Biomedicines
MDPI AG · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
19
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
The Endocrine Society · based on 26 published papers
Top 3%
4.9× avg
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
8.4× avg
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
7.1× avg
22
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 34 published papers
Top 6%
2.5× avg