Back

Generating Evidence for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Clinical Guidelines Using EHR Data

Johnson, A. M.; Adibuzzaman, M.; Griffin, P.; Bikak, M.

2019-09-20 respiratory medicine
10.1101/19006023 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this research was to develop data-driven models using electronic health records (EHRs) to conduct clinical studies for predicting clinical outcomes through probabilistic analysis that considers temporal aspects of clinical data. We assess the efficacy of antibiotics treatment and the optimal time of initiation for in-hospitalized diagnosed with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) as an application to probabilistic modeling. Materials and MethodsWe developed a semi-automatic Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) modeling and simulation approach that encodes clinical conditions as computable definitions of health states and exact time duration as input for parameter estimations using raw EHR data. We applied the MCMC approach to the MIMIC-III clinical database, where ICD-9 diagnosis codes (491.21, 491.22, and 494.1) were used to identify data for 697 AECOPD patients of which 25.9% were administered antibiotics. ResultsThe average time to antibiotic administration was 27 hours, and 32% of patients were administered vancomycin as the initial antibiotic. The model simulations showed a 50% decrease in mortality rate as the number of patients administered antibiotics increased. There was an estimated 5.5% mortality rate when antibiotics were initially administrated after 48 hours vs 1.8% when antibiotics were initially administrated between 24 and 48 hours. DiscussionOur findings suggest that there may be a mortality benefit in initiation of antibiotics early in patient with severe respiratory failure in settings of COPD exacerbations warranting an ICU admission. ConclusionProbabilistic modeling and simulation methods that considers temporal aspects of raw clinical patient data can be used to adequately generate evidence for clinical guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
29
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%