Back

Bayesian spatial modelling of childhood cancer incidence in Switzerland using exact point data: A nationwide study during 1985-2015.

Konstantinoudis, G.; Schuhmacher, D.; Ammann, R.; Diesch, T.; Kuehni, C.; Spycher, B. D.

2019-07-08 epidemiology
10.1101/19001545
Show abstract

BackgroundThe aetiology of most childhood cancers is largely unknown. Spatially varying environmental factors such as traffic-related air pollution, background radiation and agricultural pesticides might contribute to the development of childhood cancer. We investigated the spatial variation of childhood cancers in Switzerland using exact geocodes of place of residence. MethodsWe included 5,947 children diagnosed with cancer during 1985-2015 at age 0-15 from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. We modelled cancer risk using log-Gaussian Cox processes and indirect standardization to adjust for age and year of diagnosis. We examined whether the modelled spatial variation of risk can be explained by ambient air concentration of NO2, natural background radiation, area-based socio-economic position (SEP), linguistic region, years of existing general cancer registration in the canton or degree of urbanization. ResultsFor all childhood cancers combined, the posterior median relative risk (RR), compared to the national level, varied by location from 0.83 to 1.13 (min to max). Corresponding ranges were 0.96 to 1.09 for leukaemia, 0.90 to 1.13 for lymphoma, and 0.82 to 1.23 for CNS tumours. The covariates considered explained 72% of the observed spatial variation for all cancers, 81% for leukaemia, 82% for lymphoma and 64% for CNS tumours. There was evidence of an association of background radiation and SEP with incidence of CNS tumours, (1.19;0.98-1.40) and (1.6;1-1.13) respectively. ConclusionOf the investigated diagnostic groups, childhood CNS tumours show the largest spatial variation in Switzerland. The selected covariates only partially explained the observed variation of CNS tumours suggesting that other environmental factors also play a role.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.2%
6.6%
2
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 0.7%
6.6%
3
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 3%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 40%
4.7%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 19%
3.1%
7
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
9
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
11
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 78%
2.9%
12
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 8%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
13
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 0.9%
2.5%
14
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.8%
1.8%
15
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
16
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 17%
1.6%
17
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Swiss Medical Weekly
based on 12 papers
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 11%
1.4%
20
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
21
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 44%
1.4%
22
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
23
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
24
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
26
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 11%
0.7%
28
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
30
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 5%
0.7%