Back

Aerobic capacity predicts skeletal but not cardiac muscle damage after a full distance Ironman triathlon - the Iron(wo)man-study

Danielsson, T.; Carlsson, J.; Ten Siethoff, L.; Ahnesjo, J.; Bergman, P.

2019-07-03 sports medicine
10.1101/19001149
Show abstract

PurposeThis study examines the association between aerobic capacity and biomarkers of skeletal- and cardiac muscle damage among amateur triathletes after a full distance Ironman. MethodsMen and women (N=55) were recruited from local sport clubs. One month before an Iron-man triathlon, they conducted a 20m shuttle run test to determine aerobic capacity. Blood samples were taken immediately after finishing the triathlon, and analyzed for biomarkers of cardiac- and skeletal muscle damage. Regression models examining the association between aerobic capacity expressed in both relative terms (mLO2*kg-1*min-1) and absolute terms (LO2*min-1) controlled for weight and were fitted. ResultA total of 39 subjects (26% females) had complete data and were included in the analysis. No association between aerobic capacity and cardiac muscle damage but a significant negative association between aerobic capacity and skeletal muscle damage was observed. This association was independent of how aerobic capacity was expressed, although the model with aerobic capacity expressed in absolute terms and controlled for weight resulted in slightly higher r2 values, than when aerobic capacity was expressed in relative terms. ConclusionA negative association between aerobic capacity and skeletal muscle damage was seen but despite the well-known cardio-protective health effect of high aerobic fitness no such association could be observed in this study.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 7%
2.8× avg
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 3%
3.3× avg
3
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 10 published papers
#1
208× avg
4
Nutrients
MDPI AG · based on 43 published papers
Top 0.9%
22× avg
5
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 27%
3.2%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
7
Aging Cell
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.7%
24× avg
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 7%
3.2× avg
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
6.9× avg
10
Genes
MDPI AG · based on 21 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
11
BioMed Research International
Wiley · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
12
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 14%
1.6× avg
13
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
8.5× avg
14
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
4.9× avg
15
eBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 82 published papers
Top 8%
2.9× avg
16
European Journal of Epidemiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
17
BMC Geriatrics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.8× avg