Acceleration of chemical shift encoding-based water fat MRI for liver proton density fat fraction and T2* mapping using compressed sensing
Lohoefer, F. K.; Kaissis, G. A.; Mueller-Leisse, C.; Franz, D.; Katemann, C.; Hock, A.; Peeters, J. M.; Rummeny, E. J.; Karampinos, D.; Braren, R.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo evaluate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* measurements of the liver with combined parallel imaging (sensitivity encoding, SENSE) and compressed sensing (CS) accelerated chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation. MethodsSix-echo Dixon imaging was performed in the liver of 89 subjects. The first acquisition variant used acceleration based on SENSE with a total acceleration factor equal to 2.64 (acquisition labeled as SENSE). The second acquisition variant used acceleration based on a combination of CS with SENSE with a total acceleration factor equal to 4 (acquisition labeled as CS+SENSE). Acquisition times were compared between acquisitions and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2*-values were measured and compared separately for each liver segment. ResultsTotal scan duration was 14.5 sec for the SENSE accelerated image acquisition and 9.3 sec for the CS+SENSE accelerated image acquisition. PDFF and T2* values did not differ significantly between the two acquisitions (paired Mann-Whitney and paired t-test P>0.05 in all cases). CS+SENSE accelerated acquisition showed reduced motion artifacts (1.1%) compared to SENSE acquisition (12.3%). ConclusionCS+SENSE accelerates liver PDFF and T2*mapping while retaining the same quantitative values as an acquisition using only SENSE and reduces motion artifacts. Strengths of this studyO_LICompressed sensing allows accelerated imaging with reduction of motion artifacts without alteration of quantitative measurements C_LIO_LIRobust results in fat and iron quantification in a heterogeneous patient cohort C_LI Limitations of this studyO_LINo histopathological validation of the MR findings was performed C_LIO_LIThe study was not performed at different field strengths C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.