Cribriform Status at Follow-up Biopsy Is Critical for Predicting Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Failure in the MRI Era: a Transatlantic Cohort Study

Purpose To assess whether follow-up MRI, biopsy status, and timing of cribriform disease detection predict active surveillance (AS) failure in a contemporary transatlantic cohort. Materials and Methods. Retrospective MRI-driven AS cohort of 619 men at two academic centers (UK/USA), 2012-2024. Primary outcome: AS failure (disease-specific mortality, metastasis, grade group [GG] [&ge;]4 progression, or post-treatment biochemical recurrence). Key exposures: final MRI and biopsy status, timing of cribriform [&ge;]GG2 detection. Cumulative incidence was derived; independent predictors used multivariable Fine-Gray models. Results. Over median follow-up of 6.4 years, 39/619 men (6%) experienced AS failure. Cribriform [&ge;]GG2 was detected in 82/619 (13%) on follow-up biopsy versus 24/619 (4%) at baseline, comparably in baseline GG1 (10%) and non-cribriform GG2 (9%), and only in MRI-visible tumors. Three-year AS failure after final biopsy was 31% in men with cribriform [&ge;]GG2 versus 0-2% with stable or non-cribriform disease; 44% of failures had stable MRI. On Fine-Gray analysis, cribriform [&ge;]GG2 was the only independent predictor of AS failure in re-biopsied men (SHR 30; 95% CI 5.2-167; P<0.001); no type of MRI progression category was independently predictive. Among 595 men cribriform-negative at baseline, 6-year AS failure after a second biopsy was 34% if cribriform [&ge;]GG2 was detected versus 7% if still cribriform-negative. Conclusions. Cribriform status at follow-up biopsy independently predicts AS failure, whereas MRI progression does not. The three-fold higher cribriform prevalence at follow-up likely reflects baseline sampling error. Because newly detected cribriform tumours were exclusively MRI-visible, early repeat biopsy of patients with MRI-visible disease may considerably improve risk stratification.