Swiss physicians' experiences of sexual harassment at work. A nationwide survey
Dzi, K. T.; Jox, R.; Bodenmann, P.
Show abstract
Background: Workplace discrimination and violence against health workers including sexual harassment is a societal problem worldwide. We aimed to assess the frequency, predictive factors, and effects of sexual harassment using a nationwide survey of physicians working in Switzerland. Materials and Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey of physicians working in Swiss healthcare institutions. The questionnaire assessed experiences of sexual harassment at work, including frequency, types, and sources of harassment. It also asked about the impact of sexual harassment, whether incidents were reported, and what actions were taken following a report. Results: Among the 1837 physicians that participated in the survey, 575 (31.3%) had experienced sexual harassment at least once during their career. Among those reporting sexual harassment, 39.1% of women and 13.2% of men had experienced harassment at least once in their job. Women reported more verbal harassment, while men reported more physical harassment. Women were also more likely to face both forms combined. The main sources of harassment were colleagues of the same profession (46.7%), patients (42.3%), and superiors (41.0%). The most frequently reported impacts included stress (60.1%), emotional exhaustion (34.7%), reduced motivation at work (30%), and considering leaving the job (7.5%). Gender-men was associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing harassment 0.24 (0.18 to 0.31), whereas working in the German-speaking region was associated with a slightly higher likelihood of having experienced sexual harassment at least once (OR 1.35, 95% CI:1.02-1.81). Conclusions: Sexual harassment is common among physicians in Swiss healthcare institutions. It adversely affects the mental health and career trajectories of both men and women yet remains widely underreported due to fears of reprisals and inaction. Institutions should effectively intervene to ensure that reported incidents result in appropriate actions, and that those who report them receive adequate protection from reprisals.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants Of Burnout And Other Aspects Of Psychological Well-Being In Healthcare Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- The inevitability of Covid-19 related distress among healthcare workers: findings from a low caseload country under lockdown 94%
- Anxiety and Depression among Medical Doctors in Catalonia, Italy, and the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 93%
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 93%
- Casual Sex Among Msm During The Period Of Sheltering In Place To Prevent The Spread Of COVID-19: Results Of National, Online Surveys In Brazil And Portugal 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes in Oman during COVID19: Frontline vs Non-frontline Healthcare Workers 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
- "I had to leave. I had to leave my clinic, my city, leave everything behind in Syria". Qualitative accounts from Syrian health care workers migrating from the war-torn country 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 93%
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 92%
- Correlates of reproductive coercion among young women in Kingston, Jamaica and Hanoi, Vietnam 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.