Back

Real-world perioperative FLOT delivery in gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-centre service evaluation in a District General Hospital in the UK

Sabharwal, R.; Bhaskaran, D.

2026-10-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.10.19.26365836 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Although perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is the standard neoadjuvant regimen for resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, evidence describing treatment delivery in routine clinical practice remains limited, particularly regarding relative dose intensity (RDI) and treatment completion. Objectives: To evaluate real-world delivery of preoperative FLOT chemotherapy, including treatment completion, progression to surgery, RDI, toxicity and exploratory changes in estimated lean body mass (LBM). Methods: A retrospective single-centre service evaluation included consecutive patients receiving neoadjuvant FLOT during 2024. Outcomes included treatment completion, surgery, RDI, toxicity, pathological response and estimated LBM. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Twelve patients were included (median age 68.6 years; 91.7% male). Eleven (91.6%) completed all four preoperative cycles and proceeded to surgery. Mean RDI was 76.7%. Pre-emptive dose capping was the predominant dose modification strategy, with only one reactive dose reduction. Two grade 3 adverse events occurred. Major pathological response (Mandard grade 1-2) was observed in 2/12 patients (16.7%). Mean estimated LBM declined from 54.3 to 53.4 kg. Greater LBM loss appeared to coincide with poorer clinical outcomes. Conclusions: High treatment completion and progression to surgery were achieved despite reduced RDI. These findings support prospective evaluation of strategies to optimise chemotherapy delivery while maintaining tolerability in routine clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.