Self-harm incidents and restrictive practice use in an acute female inpatient unit: a service evaluation of a continuous multi-system improvement approach
Johnson, S.; Kelbrick, M.; Griffiths, C.; Al-Falahi, A.; Mann, N.; Robano, T.; Hart, K.
Show abstract
Background: Self-harm is a frequent and challenging occurrence in adult inpatient psychiatric units. The use of restrictive practice to manage self-harm incidents continues to be widespread within mental health environments despite increasing national and organisational guidance to minimise its use. Aim: The aim of this project was to introduce and evaluate a continuous quality improvement programme to progressively reduce incidents of self-harm and the use of restrictive practice. The project was set in a female acute mental health inpatient unit. The project sought to embed improvements in an inpatient unit interventions, procedures, and culture and staff mindset, and move towards a sustained collaborative and positive therapeutic and communication-based approach. Methods: A retrospective service evaluation design was employed to assess differences in the number of incidents of self-harm, enhanced observation, seclusion, restraint and rapid tranquillisation in the period following the introduction of a continuous whole-systems multimodal interventional initiative in 2019. Pre- and post-initiation data were compared (2017/18 compared to 2019/2025) to evaluate improvement and whether this had been sustained. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and means. Results: Self-harm incidents reduced between 2017/18 and 2019, with a downward trend sustained between 2019 and 2025 (136 to 72 incidents respectively between 2019 and 2025; 47% reduction). A sustained reduction in the use of restrictive practice was shown in all domains pre- and post-initiation (2017/18 compared to 2025). Clinical implications: No one approach will successfully reduce self-harm and the use of restrictive practice. Approaches employed have to be multi-faceted, multi-interdisciplinary, collaborative, and blend together to deliver improvement. Sustained progress requires commitment to an iterative process of continuous collaboration, improvement and adaptation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 96%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 96%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 96%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 96%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 93%
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 93%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 94%
- An overview of current mental health in the general population of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the COLLATE project 93%
- Prevalence and Predictors of General Psychiatric Disorders and Loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Results from the Understanding Society UKHLS 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.