Back

Sex-, age-, and BMI-specific patterns of visual and numerical body-size ideals in Japan: a large cross-sectional web-based survey

Tabata, H.; Sakamoto, S.; Fukumura, K.; Kanda, M.; Adachi, Y.; Yoshizawa, Y.; Tamura, Y.

2026-10-19 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.10.19.26365487 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Thinness-oriented body ideals are well described among young Japanese women, but variation in visual and numerical ideals by sex, age, and current BMI remains unclear. Methods: We analysed an unweighted web-panel sample of 27,359 Japanese adolescents and adults aged 15-69 years from the Survey of Body Shape and Health Awareness in Japanese People, a cross-sectional web-based survey. Current and ideal BMI were derived from self-reported height and weight, and visual orientation from ideal versus perceived current silhouette. Adult BMI-stratified analyses included participants aged 20-69 years. Findings: Among 27,359 participants (10,094 men and 17,265 women), relative thinness-oriented indicators increased with current BMI in both sexes. Among normal-weight women, 74.7-83.7% selected a smaller ideal silhouette and 79.2-91.2% reported an ideal BMI lower than current BMI. These indicators were also present among underweight women aged 20-29 years (44.9% and 43.4%, respectively), but declined with age. Most underweight men reported weight-gain-oriented ideals. Fine stratification showed that thinness-oriented ideals among women were common in low-normal and mid-normal BMI strata. Interpretation: Body-size ideals differed by sex, age, and current BMI. Thinness-oriented ideals among women extended beyond obesity and young adulthood, whereas underweight men generally preferred a larger body. Longitudinal and behavioural studies are needed. Funding: Cabinet Office of Japan Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), "Inclusive Community Platform" (grant no. SIPCP23C02).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.