Back

Promoting Community Living and Participation Outcomes Among Young Autistic Adults: Promising Results for an Autistic-Delivered Peer Support Intervention

Song, W.; Clarke, A.; Kaplan, K.; Reese, J.; Ventimiglia, J.; Nonnemacher, S.; Shea, L.; Salzer, M. S.

2026-10-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.18.26365838 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Autistic young adults experience substantial gaps in services supporting community living and participation. The Community Autism Peer Support (CAPS) program is a community-based intervention in which trained autistic peer specialists provide individualized support to autistic young adults pursuing self-determined goals related to community participation and independent living. We conducted a single-site, two-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the CAPS program. Forty autistic adults aged 18 to 30 years were randomized to CAPS (n = 20) or services as usual alone (n = 20) and assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Study findings showed that CAPS attracted autistic young adults with diverse demographic and diagnostic backgrounds, and most intervention participants remained engaged in services for extended periods. While the study was underpowered to detect statistical differences in outcomes because it was not a main focus of the research, a consistent pattern of results favored the CAPS condition across all outcomes. The largest positive signals were observed for overall and social quality of life, with additional favorable changes in internalized stigma, unmet needs, social functioning, loneliness, and positive autistic identity. Findings provide support for the feasibility and promise of an autistic-delivered peer specialist model focused on community living and participation. The consistent pattern of favorable changes supports continued development of CAPS as a person-centered approach to addressing outcomes important to autistic adults.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.