Back

Timing of Addiction Consultation and Alcohol Withdrawal Management in Hospitalized Adults

Reese, T.; Kast, K. A.; Marcovitz, D.; Stewart-Kast, L.; Tindle, H.; Wright, A.; Shah, M.; Menon, S.; von Horn, A.

2026-10-21 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.10.18.26365824 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective To evaluate the association of early addiction consultation with withdrawal pharmacotherapy and complications in hospitalized patients with alcohol withdrawal. Methods Retrospective single-center cohort of adult hospitalizations with alcohol withdrawal (diagnosis code or CIWA-Ar [≥]10 within 24 hours) from July 2020 to January 2026. Exposure was an addiction consult service order within 24 hours of arrival, compared with no or later consultation. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after the first 24 hours and delirium tremens or withdrawal seizure not present on admission. Process outcomes included phenobarbital and thiamine administration within 24 hours and benzodiazepine dose in the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and 30-day death or return to hospital. Results Of 4,663 hospitalizations, 1,379 (29.6%) received early consultation. After adjustment, early consultation was associated with lower odds of ICU transfer (odds ratio [OR] 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.99) and fewer episodes of delirium tremens (risk difference -1.09 per 100; -1.45 to -0.73), with no significant difference in withdrawal seizure. Early consultation was associated with phenobarbital (OR 1.57; 1.32-1.86) and thiamine (OR 1.23; 1.07-1.41) within 24 hours, higher 48-hour lorazepam-equivalent dose (ratio of geometric means 1.44; 1.32-1.57), shorter stays (ratio 0.92; 0.88-0.97), and lower odds of 30-day death or return to hospital (OR 0.78; 0.66-0.91). Conclusions Early addiction consultation was associated with earlier, more intensive withdrawal pharmacotherapy, lower odds of ICU transfer, and fewer episodes of delirium tremens, although the complication associations were sensitive to cohort definition.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.