Morphometric Brain Networks at Ultra-Low Field: A First Assessment of Feasibility and Reliability

Background: Ultra-low field (ULF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers accessible point-of-care neuroimaging, yet its capability to support multivariate network analyses remains understudied. Methods: We systematically evaluated the feasibility and reliability of Morphometric Similarity Networks (MSN) and Morphometric Inverse Divergence (MIND) networks derived from paired high-field (HF, 3T/1.5T) and ULF (64mT) scans in a primary cohort(N=23) and an independent replication cohort (N=19). We tested the impact of super-resolution processing, cortical parcellation granularity (Desikan-Killiany vs. Destrieux), and mesh resolution (fsnative vs. fsaverage5) on edge-level cross-scanner agreement (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, CCC) and subject-level identifiability. Results: MIND networks demonstrated higher edge-level HF-ULF agreement (mean CCC = 0.95) and ULF reproducibility (mean CCC = 0.98) compared to MSNs (mean CCC = 0.86-0.87 and 0.91-0.94, respectively). In contrast, MSNs yielded higher subject-level differential identifiability across field strengths due to a broader distinction between within- and between-subject similarity. Reconstructing MIND networks on native high-resolution meshes (fsnative) maximised cross-scanner agreement, whereas coarser meshes and finer cortical parcellations enhanced individual network identifiability. Conclusions: Structural similarity networks can be reliably constructed from ULF MRI data. Optimal analytic choices depend on study objectives: MIND on native meshes maximises cross-scanner stability, whereas MSNs excel at preserving individual uniqueness, paving the way for globally scalable connectomic research.