Cohort Versus Nested Case-Control Design for Prediction Models of Rare Outcomes Using Electronic Health Records
Fan, R.; Azadnajafabad, S.; Reps, J. M.; Bowe, B.; Hofford, M. R.; Lim, K.-H.; Hripcsak, G.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, L.
Show abstract
Objective: To determine how cohort versus nested case-control (NCC) design affects EHR-based prediction of a rare outcome. Materials and Methods: We compared two cohort and five NCC designs for predicting early-onset gastrointestinal cancer using L1-regularized logistic regression (LASSO), XGBoost, and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Models underwent nested five-fold cross-validation with model-specific hyperparameter tuning and temporal evaluation in a held-out prospective cohort representing intended deployment. Model discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Model calibration was assessed using Brier scores and calibration plots before and after recalibration with isotonic regression. Feature-ranking similarity was quantified using rank-biased overlap. Results: The cohort development datasets included 256,854-415,529 patients, with 2-yr cumulative incidence of 0.12%-0.17%, compared with approximately 9% in the 1:10 matched NCC datasets. NCC designs generally produced higher internal discrimination, but temporal performance varied by algorithm and index-date definition. Cohort designs achieved the highest temporal AUPRC for LASSO (0.068), whereas diagnosis-anchored NCC achieved the highest temporal AUPRC for XGBoost (0.086) and MLP (0.070). Temporal AUPRC generally decreased as the required lead time before diagnosis increased. Raw predicted probabilities substantially overestimated observed risks in the temporal cohort. Isotonic recalibration improved probability scaling while largely preserving discrimination, although residual miscalibration remained. Cohort-based feature rankings were more consistent across algorithms, whereas NCC-based rankings depended more strongly on algorithm and index-date anchoring. Conclusion: Study design should be selected and evaluated according to the intended clinical prediction task and deployment setting.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 92%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 91%
- Assessing the quality of clinical and administrative data extracted from hospitals: The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) experience 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 93%
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 92%
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adoption of the OMOP CDM for Cancer Research using Real-world Data: Current Status and Opportunities 92%
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Classifying HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry Slides and Implications for HER2-Low Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
- International Electronic Health Record-Derived COVID-19 Clinical Course Profiles: The 4CE Consortium 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining structured and unstructured data in eMRs to create clinically-defined eMR-derived cohorts 92%
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 91%
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of AI-based pre-screening of large bowel biopsies 92%
- Multicenter Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Diagnosing Pediatric Patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease 90%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.