Network representations of digital clock drawings for cognitive impairment detection
Pinheiro, A.; Cheng, H.; Karjadi, C.; Gifford, K.; Demissie, S.; Lunetta, K. L.; Liu, C.; Au, R.; Mohammed, S.
Show abstract
INTRODUCTION: The digital clock drawing test (dCDT) is a cognitive screening tool capturing high-resolution pen-movement data. Existing approaches for classifying cognitive impairment from dCDTs rely on selected features or image-based methods. We propose representing dCDTs as structural networks to classify cognitive impairment and characterize spatial organization in clock drawings. METHODS: Weighted networks were constructed from 3,362 Framingham Heart Study participants, with and without cognitive impairment. Network representations were generated separately for command and copy conditions, with nodes representing pre-defined clock components (digits, hands, clock face) and edges capturing pairwise spatial relationships between components. Random forest models and graph convolutional networks were trained to predict cognitive impairment from the networks. Models were benchmarked against demographics-only and established summary feature baselines. RESULTS: Network-based models achieved AUC values comparable to the established summary feature baseline across command-only and copy-only conditions. Differences in spatial organization between the cognitively intact and impaired groups were greatest in the upper-right clock region, involving digits 1 and 2, the clock hands, and the surrounding clock face. Differences between the command and copy networks were larger among cognitively impaired participants. DISCUSSION: The proposed network representations provide an objective, scalable, and flexible framework for representing clock drawings for use in classification models. dCDT networks matched the predictive performance of established summary feature-based approaches and identified clock regions where spatial organization differed by cognitive status. After external validation, this approach has the potential to be incorporated within a clinical workflow to support automated and interpretable cognitive screening.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable deep learning approach for extracting cognitive features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons in older adults 92%
- A Clinical Neuroimaging Platform for Rapid, Automated Lesion Detection and Personalized Post-Stroke Outcome Prediction 91%
- A Remote Digital Memory Composite to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Memory Clinic Samples in Unsupervised Settings using Mobile Devices 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypergraph Clustering for Analyzing Chronic Disease Patterns in Mild Cognitive Impairment Reversion and Progression 91%
- An Unsupervised XAI Framework for Dementia Detection with Context Enrichment 91%
- Lesion site and therapy time predict responses to a therapy for anomia after stroke: a prognostic model development study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- CharMark: A Markov Approach to Linguistic Biomarkers in Dementia 92%
- Remote digital measurement of visual and auditory markers of Major Depressive Disorder severity and treatment response. 90%
- Transfer learning on structural brain age models to decode cognition in MS: a federated learning approach 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 92%
- Memorability of photographs in subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: implications for cognitive assessment 92%
- Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.