A clinical laboratory test-wide association scan of polygenic scores identifies biomarkers of psychiatric disorders
Reed, M. L.; Feuer, K. L.; Kember, R. L.
Show abstract
Background: Psychiatric disorders pose a significant public health burden, and their complex genetic architecture underlies multiple biological pathways, contributing to a lack of diagnostic biomarkers. Laboratory-Wide Association Studies (LabWAS) leverage electronic health record laboratory data as intermediary phenotypes to link genetic risk to physiology. Methods: Polygenic Scores (PGS) for 25 health-related, psychiatric, and substance use phenotypes were generated for individuals of African (AFR; N=10,473) and European (EUR, N=35,131) ancestry from the Penn Medicine Biobank. Laboratory data was prepared using the LabWAS pipeline, encompassing 78 laboratory tests and 6 vital signs. Linear regression models tested the association of each lab value with PGS adjusting for sex, age, and ten within-ancestry genetic principal components. Results: Four PGS were significantly associated with at least one laboratory value in AFR individuals and 22 PGS in EUR individuals. In EUR individuals, psychiatric PGS partitioned into three physiological profiles: anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder shared a metabolic/inflammatory signature (higher BMI, glucose, and monocytes; lower high density lipoprotein cholesterol and oxygen saturation); anorexia nervosa, obsessive compulsive disorder, and schizophrenia were characterized by lower BMI; and bipolar disorder demonstrated a more circumscribed profile with lower electrolytes and renal makers. Substance use disorder PGS similarly clustered: tobacco use disorder and externalizing showed metabolic/inflammatory profiles; alcohol-related phenotypes showed lower red blood cell indices; and cannabis use disorder had a more circumscribed profile. Conclusions: LabWAS reveals physiologic signatures associated with genetic risk for psychiatric disorders, offering new biological insights into their pathology.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Drinking and smoking polygenic risk is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes of children and young adults independently of psychopathology and substance use 94%
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 93%
- Serum Metabolites Associated with Depression and Anxiety in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Genetic Atlas of Relationships Between Circulating Metabolites and Liability to Psychiatric Conditions 95%
- The genomic basis of mood instability: identification of 46 loci in 363,705 UK Biobank participants, genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, and association with gene expression and function. 95%
- The Common Genetic Architecture of Anxiety Disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible Risk Loci and Psychiatric Comorbidities in Anxiety: Results from ~200,000 Million Veteran Program Participants 93%
- Penetrance and pleiotropy of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in 90,000 patients across three healthcare systems 93%
- Psychiatric comorbidities in substance use disorders: Sex-based differences in a national real-world clinic sample 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep transcriptome sequencing of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex reveals disorder-specific expression changes in major psychiatric disorders 94%
- The Addiction Risk Factor: A Unitary Genetic Vulnerability Characterizes Substance Use Disorders and Their Associations with Common Correlates 94%
- Estimating the direct effects of the genetic liabilities to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and behavioral traits on suicide attempt using a multivariable Mendelian randomization approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.