Back

Baseline Response Criterion and Changes in Emotional Bias as Markers of Esketamine Response in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Muh, C.; Favre, P.; Lutkenherm, I. K.; Zambrano, J.; Henry, C.; Berkovitch, L.

2026-10-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.14.26365535 medRxiv
Show abstract

Negative emotional bias, including reduced processing of positive information and negative interpretation of ambiguous stimuli, is a core feature of depression. Esketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), reduces depressive symptoms, but its effects on distinct components of emotional processing remain unclear. Fifty-three patients with TRD and 53 healthy controls performed an Emotional Facial Expression Morphing task. Patients were assessed at baseline, 24 hours after the first esketamine administration, and after 4 weeks of treatment. Statistical models examined detection thresholds for happy and sad faces, negative categorisation of neutral faces, and signal detection indices separating emotion-neutral discrimination sensitivity (d') from response criterion (c), indexing the evidence required to report the presence of an emotion. At baseline, patients required greater happy-face intensity for emotion detection and were more likely to categorise detected neutral faces as negative. They also showed a more conservative response criterion without group difference in discrimination sensitivity. Responders showed an early increase in d'; and, by week 4, less negative categorisation of neutral faces than non-responders. A lower baseline response criterion was associated with responder status and, in secondary continuous analyses, with greater subsequent MADRS improvement. These findings indicate that TRD involves abnormalities across detection-related, valence-related, and decisional aspects of facial-emotion processing that are differently associated with esketamine response: baseline response criterion emerged as a candidate prognostic marker, whereas negative categorisation of neutral faces tracked clinical response. Assessing these domains may inform clinical evaluation, pending independent replication.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.