Baseline Response Criterion and Changes in Emotional Bias as Markers of Esketamine Response in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Muh, C.; Favre, P.; Lutkenherm, I. K.; Zambrano, J.; Henry, C.; Berkovitch, L.
Show abstract
Negative emotional bias, including reduced processing of positive information and negative interpretation of ambiguous stimuli, is a core feature of depression. Esketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), reduces depressive symptoms, but its effects on distinct components of emotional processing remain unclear. Fifty-three patients with TRD and 53 healthy controls performed an Emotional Facial Expression Morphing task. Patients were assessed at baseline, 24 hours after the first esketamine administration, and after 4 weeks of treatment. Statistical models examined detection thresholds for happy and sad faces, negative categorisation of neutral faces, and signal detection indices separating emotion-neutral discrimination sensitivity (d') from response criterion (c), indexing the evidence required to report the presence of an emotion. At baseline, patients required greater happy-face intensity for emotion detection and were more likely to categorise detected neutral faces as negative. They also showed a more conservative response criterion without group difference in discrimination sensitivity. Responders showed an early increase in d'; and, by week 4, less negative categorisation of neutral faces than non-responders. A lower baseline response criterion was associated with responder status and, in secondary continuous analyses, with greater subsequent MADRS improvement. These findings indicate that TRD involves abnormalities across detection-related, valence-related, and decisional aspects of facial-emotion processing that are differently associated with esketamine response: baseline response criterion emerged as a candidate prognostic marker, whereas negative categorisation of neutral faces tracked clinical response. Assessing these domains may inform clinical evaluation, pending independent replication.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pro-cognitive effects of 5-HT4 receptor agonism in individuals with remitted depression 97%
- A single dose of lamotrigine induces a positive memory bias in healthy volunteers 96%
- Emotional recognition training modifies neural response to emotional faces but does not improve mood in healthy volunteers with high levels of depressive symptoms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The disappointment centre of the brain gets exciting: A systematic review of habenula dysfunction in depression 94%
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 94%
- Magnetic resonance imaging for individual prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A meta-analysis of polygenic risk scores for mood disorders, neuroticism, and schizophrenia in antidepressant response 93%
- Effects of cannabis use on antidepressant treatment response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and ketamine 92%
- Low dose oral ketamine treatment on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (OKTOP): An open-label pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ghrelin is associated with an elevated mood after an overnight fast in depression 93%
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 92%
- Uncovering relationships between 24-hour rest-activity patterns and immune-metabolic dysfunction in young people with mood disorders. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.