Medical and non-medical out-of-pocket cost and time burden of COVID-19 illness in U.S. children and adults: a cross-sectional survey study
Rose, A.; Scherer, A.; Gedlinske, A.; Park, A.; Gidengil, C.; Askelson, N.; Lindley, M.; Gebremariam, A.; Pike, J.; Prosser, L.
Show abstract
Background: While health system costs of COVID-19 are well documented, evidence on out-of-pocket costs to patients and families, including non-medical and time burden, is limited. This study aimed to estimate out-of-pocket medical, non-medical, and time burden of COVID-19 illness directly from patients and caregivers. Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys were fielded to national nonprobability samples of U.S. adults in Fall 2023: a personal burden survey (adult sample) and a caregiver burden survey (child sample). Surveys collected data on care setting, visit duration including travel and wait time, and medical and non-medical out-of-pocket costs. After applying quality-based exclusion criteria, 409 adult sample and 52 child sample responses were analyzed. Results: Over 87% of respondents were insured. Median out-of-pocket medical costs per visit were low, ranging from $5 (emergency department) to $10 (urgent care) in the adult sample, and from $0 (emergency department) to $75 (hospitalization) in the child sample. Median non-medical costs were $28 or less across care settings. Median time spent receiving care ranged from 90 minutes (primary care, child sample) to 300 minutes (emergency department, adult sample). Despite the relatively low reported out-of-pocket costs, COVID-related financial challenges were reported by 34% of the adult sample and 29% of the child sample, with the most common difficulty being paying non-medical bills (11% and 15%, respectively). Twelve percent in both groups reported problems paying COVID-19-related medical bills. Conclusions: In this post-pandemic non-probability sample, individual out-of-pocket costs for COVID-19 illness were relatively modest. However, time burden was substantial and one-third of respondents reported financial hardship. These estimates, including non-medical and time burden not captured in administrative data, can support more robust economic evaluations of COVID-19 prevention and treatment interventions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Economic Burden of KCNT1-Related Disorders in the United States: Insights from Caregiver-Reported and EMR-Derived Data 91%
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 89%
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 91%
- Long-term Public Healthcare Burden Associated with Intimate Partner Violence among Canadian Women: A Cohort Study 90%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender disparities in access to care for time-sensitive conditions during COVID-19 pandemic in Chile 90%
- Association between vaccination rates and COVID-19 health outcomes in the United States: a population-level statistical analysis 90%
- Does pre-infection stress increase the risk of long COVID? Longitudinal associations between adversity worries and experiences in the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.