How healthcare professionals manage uncertainty around hormone replacement therapy (dis-)continuation: the TAPER qualitative Study
Hillman, S.; Jones, L.; Kuypers, N.; Molloy, E.
Show abstract
Abstract Many women experience menopausal symptoms after stopping hormone replacement therapy (HRT). An evidence gap remains regarding how women and healthcare professionals (HCPs) make decisions about discontinuing and restarting HRT. Aim To explore experiences of HCPs that support women when they discontinue and restart HRT. Design and setting Qualitative study with HCPs working in NHS primary care. Method Semi-structured interviews with HCPs (n = 15) conducted between October 2025 and March 2026. A preliminary coding template was created using the discussion guide as a framework. Each interview was then coded inductively against the template which developed iteratively. Team based discussion helped refine codes into themes and sub-themes, and a subsequent conceptual model was created. Results The model describes HCPs experiences of supporting women to discontinue HRT as an iterative process characterised by uncertainty. Discussions about discontinuation were commonly prompted by changes in clinical risk or annual HRT review, but decisions about whether and when to stop also depended on womens symptoms, side effects, life stage and readiness. HCPs described agreeing an individualised discontinuation strategy, providing support during the process, and reviewing women after discontinuation to consider alternative treatments or, where appropriate, restarting HRT. Conclusion HCPs recognise the importance of readiness to discontinue and that decision making should be woman led, with HCP support, clear practice guidance and opportunities to revisit treatment. Further research is needed to support women weigh up their personalised risk and benefit of continuing/discontinuing and identify discontinuation strategies that limit resurgent symptoms.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 93%
- Mapping of person-centred sexual and reproductive health interventions at primary healthcare settings: An umbrella review 93%
- Contraceptive use and pregnancy planning in Britain during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 93%
- Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 92%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 90%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 90%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A review of the effectiveness and experiences of welfare advice services co-located in health settings: a critical narrative systematic review 90%
- Perceptions and Misconceptions of PSA Screening in Switzerland: A Preference Epidemiology Study 89%
- Criteria for Detection of Married or Cohabiting Couples in the UK Biobank 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.