Back

Serum PFOS Concentration and Isomer Composition in Relation to Depressive Symptoms in Young Adults

Bi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Bu, H.

2026-10-15 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.10.14.26365394 medRxiv
Show abstract

Total serum perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) concentration and its isomer composition describe different aspects of internal exposure, but their respective associations with depressive symptoms remain uncertain. We examined adults aged 18-25 years in NHANES August 2021-August 2023 using survey-weighted models of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Total measured PFOS was the sum of linear PFOS and pooled monomethyl-branched PFOS; composition was their log-ratio. The analytic cohort included 169 participants, with 147 complete cases for core adjustment. Median total PFOS was 1.70 ng/mL, the median linear fraction was 72.2%, and the weighted prevalence of PHQ-9 [≥]10 was 22.6%. In the joint adjusted model, a doubling of total PFOS at fixed composition corresponded to -0.49 PHQ-9 points (95% CI, -1.65 to 0.68); a doubling of the linear-to-branched ratio at fixed total corresponded to 0.21 points (-1.94 to 2.36). Algebraic rescaling across the reported interquartile ranges yielded differences of -0.58 points (-1.95 to 0.81) for total PFOS and 0.13 points (-1.16 to 1.41) for composition. The inverse continuous-score association weakened with adjustment, whereas the screening odds ratio primarily lost precision. Excluding three observations with an isomer below detection shifted both joint coefficients. The data therefore do not establish an independent composition association or equivalent isomer effects. Experimental evidence supports candidate oxidative, inflammatory, and synaptic pathways, but differential protein binding and elimination prevent a serum composition ratio from being interpreted directly as brain dose or toxicity. Larger longitudinal analyses with isomer-resolved exposure and toxicokinetic measurements are needed to test these pathways.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.