Back

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and environmental burden show diverging associations with cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults

Bonta, K. M.; Corbett, E.; Alemu, M. K.; Darge, B. D.; HIlderbrand, L. K.; Richardson, K. A.; Ogonuwe, S. S.; Blum, I. M.; Shen, K.; McGuire, M. K.; Pandhi, D. H.; Gallagher, L. W.; Hunter, J. M.; Grant, F.; Simmons, W.; Davis, L.; Shields, P.; Cooper, S.; Rouse, M.; Wilson-Lawson, K. S.; Hughes-Culp, C.; Howard, M.; Monroe, M.; Coleman, M.; Leath, D.; Butsch, J.; Davis, N.; Henry, J.; Gregory, P.; Scharre, D.; Grant, J. G.

2026-10-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.13.26365488 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research on neighborhood context and cognitive health often relies on composite indices that collapse neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and aspects of the built environment into a single score. This study examined the extent to which neighborhood SES and built environment were associated with late-life cognitive impairment. METHOD: Participants were 281 predominantly Black older adults who completed the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Exam (SAGE), a brief cognitive screening measure. Participants also provided their home address to obtain four neighborhood metrics: Two composite measures of neighborhood disadvantage, the Environmental Justice Index (EJI) and the EJI Social-Environmental Rank, as well as the EJI Social Vulnerability Rank as a measure of neighborhood SES, and the EJI Environmental Burden Rank to measure exposure to hazardous aspects of the built environment. RESULTS: Lower neighborhood SES was associated with higher odds of cognitive impairment. In contrast, greater environmental burden was associated with lower odds of impairment, with years of education as a moderator; the association was strongest among individuals with high levels of education. The two composite scores were not associated with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Composite measures of neighborhood features may obscure distinct pathways of their effects on cognition.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.