Genetic loci associated with cocaine use identified using a novel approach to detect epistasis
Garvin, M. R.; Bergen, A. W.; Rosenblum, D. M.; Kainer, D.; Climer, S.; Goedert, J. J.; Attia, P. J.; Peng, S.; Zhang, Q.; Weiss, S. H.
Show abstract
Background Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is estimated to be 50% heritable, yet few genetic variants have been robustly associated with risk. During January 2021 to June 2024, cocaine was involved in 30% of U.S. overdose deaths. Identifying genetic contributors to CUD could inform diagnostics and treatments. The missing heritability may stem from small sample sizes, models that inadequately account for small-effect common variants, and the exclusion of large-effect structural variants like copy number changes. Epistasis likely contributes but remains challenging to detect genome-wide. Results We focused on epistasis and haplotypes rather than individual SNPs by applying the custom correlation coefficient in BlocBuster to construct allele networks from eQTL SNPs. Testing these regulatory haplotype networks for association with cocaine use in 7,826 individuals with opioid use disorder identified 12 significant associations across two ancestries. For one haplotype, raw genotyping array intensity data revealed a copy number increase at the CYP2D6 locus in individuals of European ancestry. In a subcohort of individuals who co-use cocaine and heroin (i.e., speedball), two haplotypes were also significantly associated with HIV infection. One of these involved GPR75, whose ligand, CCL5 (RANTES), is shared with CCR5, a coreceptor for HIV entry. Conclusions Our findings, integrated with long-read human pan-genomes, support a model in which non-functional copies of CYP2D6 disrupt dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and kynurenine pathways in the brain, contributing to cocaine use severity. The association of additional haplotypes with HIV status in speedball users highlights the genetic contribution to comorbid risk in high-exposure populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome chip meta-analysis elucidates the genetic architecture of rare coding variants in smoking and drinking behavior 94%
- Novel insights into the common heritable liability to addiction: a multivariate genome-wide association study 92%
- Multi-omic network analysis identifies dysregulated neurobiological pathways in opioid addiction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ancestry May Confound Genetic Machine Learning: Candidate-Gene Prediction of Opioid Use Disorder as an Example 93%
- Predicting Treatment-seeking Status for Alcohol Use Disorder Using Polygenic Scores and Machine Learning in a Deeply-Phenotyped Sample 91%
- Brain Network Segregation is Associated with Drug Use Severity in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying risk factors involved in the common versus specific liabilities to substance abuse: A genetically informed approach 92%
- Bipolar disorder and cannabis use: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study 91%
- Genetic liability for substance use associated with medical comorbidities in electronic health records of African- and European-ancestry individuals 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying novel gene dysregulation associated with opioid overdose death: A meta-analysis of differential gene expression in human prefrontal cortex 93%
- Ibrutinib as a Potential Therapeutic for Cocaine Use Disorder 92%
- Differential alterations in peripheral tryptophan pathways in methamphetamine versus MDMA users are linked to their contrasting psychiatric symptoms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Addiction Risk Factor: A Unitary Genetic Vulnerability Characterizes Substance Use Disorders and Their Associations with Common Correlates 92%
- Risky Decision-Making Predicts Dopamine Release Dynamics in Nucleus Accumbens Shell 92%
- Changes in nucleus accumbens core translatome accompanying incubation of cocaine craving 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.