Childhood Stress and Amygdala-Hippocampal Volume: A Multiverse Analysis in Adolescents
Sivakumar, P.; Hanson, J. L.
Show abstract
Childhood adversity is robustly linked to differences in amygdala and hippocampal volume. However, findings across studies have been inconsistent and contradictory. This inconsistency stems partly from the many reasonable but arbitrary choices that researchers make when operationalizing brain regions, stress exposure, and covariates. To deal with this variability, we applied a multiverse analysis approach using adolescent data from the Boston Adolescent Neuroimaging of Depression and Anxiety (BANDA) study to evaluate how multiple analytic choices influence the relationships between stress and hippocampal/amygdala volume. Our primary analysis crossed three region-of-interest operationalizations (left, right, total), four intracranial volume scaling methods, and multiple sociodemographic covariates. Greater lifetime stress severity was associated with smaller amygdala volume across 72% of specifications, and with smaller hippocampal volume across 52% of specification models. Statistical significance was strongly influenced by the region of interest. Our secondary multiverse analysis tested six operationalizations of stress exposure (total/acute/chronic x count/severity). This analysis found that the laterality pattern in the primary analysis was not strongly influenced by stress operationalization. These findings demonstrate the robustness of the stress-medial temporal lobe association and identify specific analytic choices (i.e. hemisphere operationalization) that most strongly drive the variability observed in previous literature. Our study is one of the first that utilized multiverse analysis for adversity-neuroimaging research, and provides a strong framework for evaluating and interpreting inconsistent findings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lower neural value signaling in the prefrontal cortex is related to childhood family income and depressive symptomatology during adolescence 95%
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of family income-to-needs ratio with cortical and subcortical brain volume in adolescent boys and girls 94%
- Amygdala Subregion Volumes and Apportionment in Preadolescents -- Associations with Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain Connectomics and Severity of Internalizing Symptoms in Early Adolescence Predict Severity of Suicidal Ideation in Later Adolescence 94%
- Positive Affect as a Developmental Mediator of Early Adversity and Internalizing Psychopathology 92%
- Psychological Legacies of Intergenerational Trauma under South African Apartheid: Prenatal Stress Predicts Increased Psychiatric Morbidity during Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood in Soweto, South Africa 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Interaction of Child Abuse and rs1360780 of the FKBP5 Gene is Associated with Amygdala Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Young Adults 94%
- Childhood socio-economic disadvantage predicts reduced myelin growth across adolescence and young adulthood 92%
- Pubertal hormones and the early adolescent female brain: a multimodality brain MRI study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic Risk for Depression and Anterior and Posterior Hippocampal Volume in Children and Adolescents 94%
- Brain-Symptom Network Models of Depressive Symptoms: Understanding Heterogeneity and Clinical Implications 92%
- Disrupted Limbic-Prefrontal Effective Connectivity in Response to Fearful Faces in Lifetime Depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linking brain structure to stress reactivity: Cingulate surface area predicts acute cortisol responses 95%
- Corticolimbic connectivity mediates the relationship between pubertal timing and mental health problems 94%
- Serotonin and childhood maltreatment interact to shape brain architecture and anxious avoidant behavior, a TPH2 imaging genetics approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.