Small Enough to Use, Sharper Together: VQIDS and FIRM in U.S. Youth Ages 6 18

Objective: Brief measures of depressive symptoms and family psychiatry history may support the identification of youth who warrant further assessment, but their interpretation requires population-based measurement evidence. This study evaluated the Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (VQIDS) and Family Index of Risk for Mood (FIRM) in the BENCHMARK 2025 national survey. Method: The sample consisted of 2,252 parent reports for children aged 6-18 years and 1,008 linked adolescent self-reports aged 12-18 years. Analyses examined VQIDS dimensionality, reliability, item functioning, age- and sex-based norms, and informant agreement, alongside FIRM score distributions, alternative scoring approaches, and associations with depressive symptoms. Results: VQIDS findings supported a single dimension and good internal consistency, with greatest IRT precision at elevated symptom levels and no practically meaningful differential item functioning across age or sex. Two-week stability was moderate, and parent-adolescent agreement was lower within more symptomatic subsets. FIRM totals showed stronger cross-informant agreement and retest stability. Family history scores were associated with higher VQIDS percentiles and discriminated scores at or above the 90th percentile across informants (AUROC = .670-.698). FIRMs associations were strongest with internalizing symptoms, although evidence was mixed for mood specificity. Conclusions: These findings provide a measurement and normative foundation for brief depressive symptom assessment and support family history as a complementary correlate of symptom elevation. Diagnostic and prospective prediction utility require further evaluation.