Unnoticed high human infection incidence for West Nile virus and Usutu virus in the Netherlands: evidence from a longitudinal nationwide cohort, 2020-2023
Grobben, M.; Valle, C.; Reimerink, J.; Godeke, G.-J.; Shrestha, S.; Nellestijn, C.; Abba, H.; Franz, E.; Voordouw, B. C. G.; van der Klis, F. R. M.; Vos, E. R. A.; den Hartog, G.; Reusken, C. B. E. M.
Show abstract
Background Ecological surveillance indicates (regional) establishment of West Nile virus (WNV) and Usutu virus (USUV) in the Netherlands. However, the incidence of human infections remains unknown. Methods We identified WNV and USUV infections in the Netherlands in 2020-2023, using a longitudinal, nationwide population-based cohort, applying a two-tiered serology approach based on protein micro-array and virus neutralization. IgG data were used to estimate overall seroprevalence and infection incidence, and to study antibody longevity. Study set-up enabled tracking of the period of seroconversion and linking of self-reported travel history. The analyses took account of the survey design and weights were incorporated to match the Dutch population distribution following census data. Findings Among 4290 participants, we identified 113 probable WNV and/or USUV cases, including 55 seroconversions. Thirty-six cases were confirmed by antibody neutralization, of which 12 seroconverted. Six confirmed seroconverters were identified as autochthonous infections. The overall weighted seroprevalence was estimated at 0.54% (0.21-0.87%) for WNV and 0.25% (0.09-0.40%) for USUV. The weighted incidence for autochthonous WNV and USUV infection was estimated as respectively 0.06% (95% CI 0-0.12%) and 0.04% (95% CI 0-0.09%). Interpretation The estimated infection incidence and seroprevalence of WNV and USUV indicate a substantial underdiagnosis of clinical cases in the Netherlands in 2020-2023. These observations highlight the need for increased awareness among physicians to identify cases and the need for continued paired syndromic-laboratory surveillance for these viruses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extending influenza surveillance to detect non-influenza respiratory viruses of public health relevance: analysis of surveillance data, 2015-2019, Belgium 92%
- The incubation period of 2019-nCoV infections among travellers from Wuhan, China 92%
- The risk of future mpox outbreaks among men who have sex with men: a modelling study based on cross-sectional seroprevalence data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serology-informed estimates of SARS-COV-2 infection fatality risk in Geneva, Switzerland 91%
- Evolving epidemiology of novel coronavirus diseases 2019 and possible interruption of local transmission outside Hubei Province in China: a descriptive and modeling study 91%
- Serotype-Specific Epidemiological Patterns of Inapparent versus Symptomatic Primary Dengue Virus Infections: A 17-year cohort study in Nicaragua 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel incursion of a highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N8 virus in the Netherlands, October 2020 92%
- Novel application of capture-recapture methods to estimate the completeness of contact tracing during a large outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018-2020 91%
- Serial interval and incubation period estimates of monkeypox virus infection in 12 U.S. jurisdictions, May – August 2022 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual bat viromes reveal the co-infection, spillover and emergence risk of potential zoonotic viruses 92%
- Neutralization of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and variants Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Zeta and Omicron by mRNA vaccination and infection-derived immunity through homologous and heterologous variants 92%
- Increased Transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.7 by Age and Viral Load: Evidence from Danish Households 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.