Development, validation and clinical implementation of cellular swab materials for quality assurance of pharmacogenomic point-of-care testing
Thomas, H. M.; McDermott, J. H.; Newman, W. G.; Miele, G.; Ainsworth, S.; Patton, S. J.; Morra, R.
Show abstract
Background: Pharmacogenomic point-of-care testing (PGx POCT) enables genotype-informed prescribing at the bedside, but implementation is limited by the lack of suitable reference materials and standardised external quality assessment (EQA). Methods: Fixed lymphoblastoid cell lines were formulated as swab-based materials at defined cellular inputs for MTRNR1 POCT. Materials were evaluated using Genedrive MTRNR1 assays, quantitative PCR, acceptance quality limit batch release, workflow perturbation testing and stability studies, then deployed in an international EQA programme. Results: Materials were homogeneous, workflow-compatible and reproducible, with 100% correct genotype calls at the lowest intended manufacturing cell load. Seven EQA surveys yielded 253 participant results, with full-mark rates between 87.5 and 100%, and six test failures. Most failures occurred with low cell-input materials near the assay limit of detection. The materials supported genotype concordance, performance monitoring and identification of workflow and sample-related variability. Conclusions: Workflow-compatible cell-based reference materials combined with EQA provide a scalable framework for quality-assured PGx POCT beyond specialist laboratories. International MT-RNR1 PGx POCT EQA programme deployment demonstrated feasibility in decentralised settings. The framework may provide a model for the implementation, verification and ongoing quality assessment of PGx POCT. Further evaluation across platforms, analytes, settings and participant groups is required to establish broader applicability.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Liquid Biopsy Test for Routine Hospital Use: An International Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation 91%
- Production and performance assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 biomimetic in a verification program for pandemic readiness 90%
- Rapid implementation of SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization RT-PCR testing and experience at an academic medical institution 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 92%
- Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use of Abbott PanBio - A WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 91%
- Highly performing point-of-care molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 with RNA extraction and isothermal amplification. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in point of care usage in comparison to RT-qPCR 90%
- Accuracy of four lateral flow immunoassays for anti SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a head-to-head comparative study 90%
- SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Detection Tests: test performance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.