Back

Development, validation and clinical implementation of cellular swab materials for quality assurance of pharmacogenomic point-of-care testing

Thomas, H. M.; McDermott, J. H.; Newman, W. G.; Miele, G.; Ainsworth, S.; Patton, S. J.; Morra, R.

2026-10-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.10.13.26365321 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Pharmacogenomic point-of-care testing (PGx POCT) enables genotype-informed prescribing at the bedside, but implementation is limited by the lack of suitable reference materials and standardised external quality assessment (EQA). Methods: Fixed lymphoblastoid cell lines were formulated as swab-based materials at defined cellular inputs for MTRNR1 POCT. Materials were evaluated using Genedrive MTRNR1 assays, quantitative PCR, acceptance quality limit batch release, workflow perturbation testing and stability studies, then deployed in an international EQA programme. Results: Materials were homogeneous, workflow-compatible and reproducible, with 100% correct genotype calls at the lowest intended manufacturing cell load. Seven EQA surveys yielded 253 participant results, with full-mark rates between 87.5 and 100%, and six test failures. Most failures occurred with low cell-input materials near the assay limit of detection. The materials supported genotype concordance, performance monitoring and identification of workflow and sample-related variability. Conclusions: Workflow-compatible cell-based reference materials combined with EQA provide a scalable framework for quality-assured PGx POCT beyond specialist laboratories. International MT-RNR1 PGx POCT EQA programme deployment demonstrated feasibility in decentralised settings. The framework may provide a model for the implementation, verification and ongoing quality assessment of PGx POCT. Further evaluation across platforms, analytes, settings and participant groups is required to establish broader applicability.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.