Back

Levodopa Preferentially Reorganizes Dorsal Subthalamic Activity in Parkinsons Disease

Nair, S.; Joshi, P.; Filyushkina, V.; Sayfulina, K.; Guha, A.; Sedov, A.; Shaikh, A. G.

2026-10-15 neurology
10.64898/2026.10.13.26365259 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Dopamine replacement reshapes subthalamic activity in Parkinson's disease, but whether this response reflects anatomically organized network reconfiguration remains unclear. Objectives: To determine whether levodopa preferentially reorganizes dorsal subthalamic spectral activity and cortico-subthalamic directionality. Methods: Twelve participants undergoing bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation contributed 30 contacts (14 dorsal, 16 ventral). Recordings obtained OFF and ON medication underwent spectral parameterization and multiband state-space analysis. Simultaneous electroencephalography in six participants enabled assessment of directional cortico-subthalamic coupling using the phase slope index. Results: Levodopa suppressed beta power more strongly dorsally than ventrally (-2.473 versus -0.120 dB; p=0.0438). Dorsal theta power increased, with a trend toward an increase after baseline normalization (p=0.07). Dorsal contacts exhibited greater theta-beta (+5.904 versus +1.610 dB; p=0.006) and gamma-beta (+2.516 versus +0.384 dB; p=0.0188) state-space shifts, principally driven by beta suppression. Gamma changes did not differ regionally. Concurrently, dorsal low-beta and beta interactions shifted toward cortical leading at selected electrodes, whereas ventral responses were less consistent. Conclusions: Levodopa produces a topographically organized subthalamic response, combining preferential dorsal beta suppression with altered cortico-subthalamic directionality. These findings position contact anatomy as a key consideration in characterizing dopaminergic network responses and motivate clinical validation of spatially informed multiband biomarkers for adaptive stimulation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.