Back

Stage-specific overall survival with complete five-year follow-up after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer at a referral hospital in Shanghai, China: a reference for comparing hospitals

Sah, B. K.; Gu, D.; Li, J.; Chen, E.

2026-10-14 surgery
10.64898/2026.10.12.26365370 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Comparing long-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery between hospitals requires a common reference. Risk-adjusted benchmarks depend on the model and population used to build them and are difficult for another hospital to reproduce. TNM stage is a prognostic classification already recorded for every resected gastric cancer. We report unadjusted stage-specific overall survival from a consecutive cohort with complete follow-up as reference data and propose a minimal dataset for producing comparable figures elsewhere. Methods. The cohort comprised 690 consecutive eligible patients who underwent curative-intent D2 gastrectomy for stage I to III adenocarcinoma at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, in 2019. All operations were performed by eight experienced, high-volume consultant surgeons. Stage followed the AJCC 8th edition: pTNM after upfront surgery (n = 570) and ypTNM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 120). Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method without adjustment. Results. There were 199 deaths, 181 within five years. Every survivor was followed for at least 68.1 months. After upfront surgery, five-year overall survival was 95.0% (95% CI 91.4 to 97.1) for stage I, 83.8% (76.5 to 89.0) for stage II and 56.5% (49.2 to 63.1) for stage III, and was 95.0% in IA and 95.2% in IB, falling to 26.7% in IIIC. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, five-year survival was 78.6%, 61.9% and 31.3% for ypStage I, II and III. Pooling pTNM and ypTNM lowered stage III five-year survival to 50.2%. The proposed minimal dataset has 16 items, 13 of them recorded during the admission for gastrectomy. Conclusions. These figures are intended as a reference for comparing hospitals rather than as a standard of care. We propose 16 items, most of them routinely recorded, from which another hospital can produce the same table and compare its results by stage.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.