Back

Introducing Infrastructure as Code for deployment and governance of medical AI: A case study

Vogel, M.; Reuter, N.; Ruf, S.; Noori, A.; Madrid, J.; Balicer, R.; Witzenrath, M.; Sander, L. E.; Groeschel, M. I.

2026-10-13 health informatics
10.64898/2026.10.12.26365327 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clinical AI deployment rarely reaches the bedside because both workstation integration and governed backend provisioning are challenging. We introduce a workflow that allows rapid and governed access to AI functionalities through a browser interface or API, enabling privacy-compliant data analysis. The complex setup for compliant healthcare applications such as a secure backend, private AI model endpoint, and managed identity configuration is encoded by itself, a concept known as Infrastructure as Code (IaC). IaC is a concept in which networks, access rights, and service endpoints are written down as machine-readable files that can be reviewed once and executed identically in any institution. Here, we apply this concept to a clinical use case. The process of deploying a governed, private clinical AI solution using this approach in a tertiary care center took, on average, 310.3 +- 196.6 seconds (n=25, mean +- SD). To further demonstrate the clinical value of this approach, we developed and deployed an LLM-based inconsistency checker, which identifies textual inconsistency in medical documents. When evaluating the tool on a set of 1,347 physician-approved clinical documents, the tool flagged a clinically severe inconsistency in 105 clinical documents (7.8%, approximately 1 in 13). In a severity-stratified physician audit, 149 of 150 sampled findings were confirmed (population-weighted PPV 98.2%; CI 94.8 - 100.0). In summary, we present the application of IaC frameworks to a healthcare use case and demonstrate that clinically useful AI applications can be deployed to physician workstations in hospital-governed cloud environments within a few minutes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.