Back

Age- and Sex-Specific Norms for ADHD Symptoms and Performance on the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale

Evans, S. W.; Bhaskar, S. K.; Liu, Y.; Youngstrom, E. A.; Owens, J. S.; Rosenthal, E.

2026-10-13 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.12.26365313 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To provide national norms, percentiles, and results of factor analyses for the ADHD symptoms and performance items on the parent-report and self-report versions of the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale (VAS) for youth ages 6 to 17. We hypothesized that symptom items would demonstrate separate inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity factors, performance items would demonstrate interpretable latent dimensions, measurement invariance would be supported across age and sex, and symptom ratings would vary systematically by age and sex. Method: In a nationally stratified survey conducted in July 2025-March 2026, 2,230 parents of youth aged 6-17 years and 996 adolescents aged 12-17 years completed Vanderbilt Assessment Scale items. Both versions asked about the frequency of 18 ADHD symptoms and performance in 8 domains. To evaluate the psychometric properties and age-related normative curves of the VAS across parent- and youth-report forms, we conducted exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and measurement invariance testing. We also generated age and sex-specific norms. Results: Factor analyses produced the expected two symptom factors and two performance factors. Developmental and sex-specific patterns of ratings of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms indicated that after increasing slightly during the preadolescent years, parent ratings of inattention symptoms declined and remained stable. In contrast, ratings of hyperactivity/impulsivity declined steadily with age. Normative data were generated using GAMLSS estimated centiles from fitted probability distributions. Conclusions: This study provides norms for the parent-report and adolescent self-report VAS. Findings underscore the importance of using sex- and age-based norms to better inform estimates of severity and diagnostic decision making.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.