Age- and Sex-Specific Norms for ADHD Symptoms and Performance on the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale
Evans, S. W.; Bhaskar, S. K.; Liu, Y.; Youngstrom, E. A.; Owens, J. S.; Rosenthal, E.
Show abstract
Objective: To provide national norms, percentiles, and results of factor analyses for the ADHD symptoms and performance items on the parent-report and self-report versions of the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale (VAS) for youth ages 6 to 17. We hypothesized that symptom items would demonstrate separate inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity factors, performance items would demonstrate interpretable latent dimensions, measurement invariance would be supported across age and sex, and symptom ratings would vary systematically by age and sex. Method: In a nationally stratified survey conducted in July 2025-March 2026, 2,230 parents of youth aged 6-17 years and 996 adolescents aged 12-17 years completed Vanderbilt Assessment Scale items. Both versions asked about the frequency of 18 ADHD symptoms and performance in 8 domains. To evaluate the psychometric properties and age-related normative curves of the VAS across parent- and youth-report forms, we conducted exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and measurement invariance testing. We also generated age and sex-specific norms. Results: Factor analyses produced the expected two symptom factors and two performance factors. Developmental and sex-specific patterns of ratings of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms indicated that after increasing slightly during the preadolescent years, parent ratings of inattention symptoms declined and remained stable. In contrast, ratings of hyperactivity/impulsivity declined steadily with age. Normative data were generated using GAMLSS estimated centiles from fitted probability distributions. Conclusions: This study provides norms for the parent-report and adolescent self-report VAS. Findings underscore the importance of using sex- and age-based norms to better inform estimates of severity and diagnostic decision making.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Special Issue: Demographic and Mental Health Assessments in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Updates and Longitudinal Trajectories 94%
- A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding the Emergence of Sex Differences in Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescence 90%
- Negative Impact of Daily Screen Use on Inhibitory Control Network in Preadolescence: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 93%
- Visual processing oscillates differently through time for adults with ADHD 92%
- Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Early neurodevelopmental problems and risk for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in the general child population: a Japanese birth cohort study 93%
- Early joint attention abilities measured by the ADOS-2 predict subsequent expressive language development in minimally verbal autistic children 90%
- Changes in child and adolescent mental health across the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2023): Insights from general population and clinical samples in the Netherlands 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive, emotional, and social functioning of preschoolers with attention deficit hyperactivity problems 93%
- Problematic Internet Use in Children and Adolescents: Associations with psychiatric disorders and impairment 90%
- Assessing the influence of parental anxiety on childhood anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.