Parent-Reported Child Mania Rating Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Norms in a Nationally Representative US Sample
McClellan, M. B.; Alcaino, C.; Liu, Y.; Rodda, P. A.; Youngstrom, J.; Findling, R. L.; Youngstrom, E. A.
Show abstract
Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties, factor structure, validity, and age- and sex-specific norms of the 21- and 10-item parent-report Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS-P) in a nationally representative U.S. sample of youth aged 6-18 years. Method: Parents of 2,229 youth aged 6-18 years [weighted M(SD)=12.0(3.3) years; 45.9% female] completed the CMRS-P and related measures between July 2025 and March 2026. Data were weighted to represent U.S. demographics. A clinical comparison sample included parents of 522 youth seeking outpatient mental health services. Complete-case analyses evaluated reliability, factor structure, item response theory, measurement equivalence, retest stability, and convergent and discriminant validity. GAMLSS estimated age- and sex-specific norms. Results: Weighted mean scores were 8.5(SD=9.0) for CMRS-P-21 and 4.0(4.3) for CMRS-P-10. Internal consistency was high ({omega}=.97/.93), and forms correlated .95. A general severity factor explained most reliable variance ({omega}H=.94). Three items differed in response thresholds across samples, with an average impact below one point on expected total scores. Both forms correlated strongly with attention problems, suicidality, depression, externalizing symptoms, and emotion dysregulation (r=.51-.63 for CMRS-P-21) and negligibly with pubertal status. Reliable-change thresholds were 14.5 (CMRS-P-21) and 6.8 (CMRS-P-10) points. Weighted GAMLSS CMRS-P-21 95th percentiles declined with age in males (30-23) and increased in females (22-30), with wide bootstrap intervals at age extremes; the female trend was not replicated without weights. Conclusions: Findings support both CMRS-P forms for assessing youth manic symptoms. The first nationally representative U.S. norms provide age- and sex-adjusted benchmarks for interpreting scores and informing further clinical assessment.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development 92%
- A study of psychological pain in substance use disorder and its relationship to treatment outcome 91%
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 93%
- Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample 92%
- Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder following Childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 94%
- Elevated levels of hoarding in ADHD: a special link with inattention 92%
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to assess ADHD in young adulthood 92%
- A Systematic Review of the Etiology and Neurobiology of Intermittent Explosive Disorder 91%
- The Trajectory of Depression and Anxiety Among Children and Adolescents over Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Broad Structure of Psychopathology in the All of Us Research Program 92%
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 92%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.