Back

Patterns and correlates of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among higher-risk men who have sex with men in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia

Lee, Y. G.; Nevendorff, L.; Reswana, W.; Wong, T. Y.; Yang, X.; Xu, Y.; Yang, C.; Huang, Y.; Oktavianus, J.; Wu, E.

2026-10-14 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.10.12.26364848 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA), Indonesia are disproportionately affected by HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a viable strategy for addressing enduring HIV disparities, yet remains underutilized among MSM in the JMA. Patterns and influences of PrEP use may inform future intervention targets but have not been extensively studied in this context. Methods Guided by the Andersen's Behavioral Model for Health Services Use, the present study investigated multidimensional correlates of varied PrEP use patterns among 183 JMA-based MSM aged 18-51 (median age=29) and at elevated risk of HIV infection. The multinomial regression model identified factors associated with current PrEP use and some use in the past, compared with never use (reference category). Results In the present study, 107 (58%) participants reported never use, 34 (19%) current use, and 42 (23%) some use of PrEP. Current PrEP use was negatively associated with HIV stigma and positively with perceived social support, online HIV information seeking, and sexualized drug use. Some PrEP use was negatively associated with HIV stigma and positively with online HIV information seeking. Conclusions The study findings provide support for the Andersen model's emphasis on predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and need factors when tailoring PrEP implementation for higher-risk MSM in the JMA. Addressing stigma, reinforcing social support and HIV knowledge, and integrating PrEP care within multiple health care systems appear viable avenues for improving PrEP adoption in this key population.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.