Development and Cross-Database External Validation of 24-Hour Landmark Models for ICU Mortality After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Incremental Value of Routine Coagulation Markers
Pathak, S.; Si, Y.; Sanjaya, J.; Haghi, M.; Kudrot, N. T.; Placencia, G.; Alaei, K.; Pishgar, M.
Show abstract
Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high early mortality. Although routine coagulation markers are clinically relevant, their incremental value for mortality prediction beyond neurologic and physiologic information is uncertain. We developed and externally validated models using first-24-hour ICU data and evaluated the added predictive value of routine coagulation measurements. Methods: We used MIMIC-IV for model development and eICU-CRD for external validation. The development cohort included 2,669 adults with non-traumatic ICH and 388 ICU deaths. Logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost were evaluated using a patient-level 70:30 holdout split and 5-fold stratified cross-validation. External validation used a high-specificity primary eICU cohort (396 patients; 39 deaths) and a broader secondary hemorrhagic-stroke/likely-ICH cohort (1,555 patients; 168 deaths). Performance was assessed using AUROC, AUPRC, Brier score, calibration, and paired bootstrap comparisons. GCS-only and age-plus-GCS models served as clinical benchmarks. Coagulation-only, clinical-only, and combined XGBoost models were compared to assess incremental value. Results: In the internal holdout cohort, AUROCs were 0.870 for logistic regression, 0.859 for random forest, and 0.867 for XGBoost. In the primary external cohort, corresponding AUROCs were 0.804, 0.839, and 0.817; AUPRCs were 0.342, 0.419, and 0.406; and Brier scores were 0.080, 0.072, and 0.074. In the broader cohort, AUROCs were 0.826, 0.848, and 0.838. Random forest showed the numerically strongest external performance, but pairwise AUROC differences among multivariable models were not clearly supported. GCS-only achieved AUROCs of 0.780 and 0.813 in the primary and broader cohorts. Coagulation-only XGBoost showed weak discrimination (AUROC 0.598 internally, 0.598 primary external, and 0.566 broader external). Adding coagulation variables to the clinical model produced AUROC differences of 0.014 (95% CI -0.009 to 0.037) and 0.003 (95% CI -0.007 to 0.013) in the two external cohorts. Conclusions: Multivariable models based on first-24-hour ICU data retained useful discrimination across external cohorts and provided modest gains over simple GCS-based benchmarks. Routine coagulation markers alone were weak predictors and did not provide clearly supported incremental discrimination beyond broader clinical information. Cross-database transportability should be interpreted together with phenotype alignment and calibration.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputation strategies for missing baseline neurological assessment covariates after traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study 94%
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 94%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early detection of in-patient deterioration: one prediction model does not fit all 92%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 92%
- Development of a data-driven COVID-19 prognostication tool to inform triage and step-down care for hospitalised patients in Hong Kong: A population based cohort study 92%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a predictive risk model for severe COVID-19 disease using population-based administrative data 92%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 92%
- Machine learning-based forecasting of daily acute ischemic stroke admissions using weather data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sepsis Subphenotyping Based on Organ Dysfunction Trajectory 92%
- Derivation of four computable 24-hour pediatric sepsis phenotypes to facilitate personalized enrollment in early precise anti-inflammatory clinical trials 92%
- Dosing Of Thromboprophylaxis And Mortality In Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.