Back

A national ecosystem for long-read genome sequencing: Integrating population genomics and rare disease diagnostics in Sweden

Ameur, A.; Taylan, F.; Ek, M.; Eisfeldt, J.; Häggqvist, S.; Pettersson, M.; Bunikis, I.; Klar, J.; Strandh, M.; Josefson, R.; Barbaro, M.; Beskow, A.; Blomberg, A.; Bondeson, M.-L.; Carlberg, D.; Corcoran, P.; Duba, I.; Ellegard, R.; Engström, G.; Fall, T.; Frykholm, C.; Gallardo, M.; Gruvberger Saal, S.; Gummesson, A.; Gustafsson, P.; Hagwall, A.; Hallin, J.; Heintz, J.; Helgadottir, H. T.; Hellstedt Kerje, S.; Henmyr, V.; Henry, O. J.; Höijer, I.; Ivarsson, S.; Jemt, A.; Jernberg, T.; Johansson, A.; Soller, M. J.; Jonsäll, L.; Jonson, T.; Jonsson, F.; Karrman, K.; Kashyap, A.; Koc, A.; K

2026-10-13 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.10.09.26365121 medRxiv
Show abstract

To evaluate the clinical implementation of long-read genome sequencing (lrGS) and establish the population reference resources needed to support its use in diagnostics, we integrate two complementary initiatives: Genome of Sweden (GoS), Sweden's contribution to Genome of Europe (GoE), and the Genomic Medicine Sweden - Rare Diseases (GMS-RD) long-read sequencing pilot. The initial GoS release of 576 individuals provides population-scale maps of genetic and epigenetic variation. Among 485 GMS-RD probands, 161 (33.2%) receive a molecular diagnosis, with lrGS providing added clinical value in 40 (24.8%). As a first-line test, lrGS could have avoided at least 42 follow-up analyses and an additional testing cycle in 7.2% of probands, reducing costs and the burden on patients. By integrating population and clinical long-read genomics, Sweden establishes a national ecosystem for genomic research and clinical diagnostics. Our findings support the clinical implementation of lrGS and offer a scalable model for national collaboration.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.