Linking somatic variants to altered methylation profiles in nanopore-derived breast and pancreatic cancer genomes using unduliner
Atanda, H. C.; Ewing, A. D.
Show abstract
Research shows that genetic variation directly influences DNA methylation, and this association has generally been explored on germline SNPs and at a population level. The presence of genomic variation and base modification on sequence reads generated from a technology like nanopore sequencing offers an opportunity to link disease-specific variants to methylation changes in individual genomes. Here, we present unduliner, a framework with an embedded pretrained convolutional neural network model, that predicts somatic variants, single-nucleotide (SNVs) and structural (SVs), associated with methylation pattern changes in cancer genomes. We trained the model (accuracy = 0.803 on validation; 0.897 on held-out test) using phased sequence reads, single-nucleotide germline variants, per-base methylation probability, and variant proximity or presence in haplotype-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Unduliner was applied to subline-specific variants from MCF7 breast cancer cell lines as proof-of-concept, and we demonstrated its ability to identify variant-stratified methylation differences independent of haplotype-based methylation differences. In a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) sample, we identified coding and non-coding SNVs and SVs associated with tumour-normal DMRs, allele-specific methylation, and intratumour DMRs. These observations demonstrate that integrating long-read methylation and variant information can provide additional interpretative context for both coding and non-coding genomic variation beyond the conventional variant impact prediction tools. The results from unduliner include variant information, size and direction of methylation change with respect to the variant (increase or decrease), and genomic location of methylation change. Unduliner is publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/Chisomgold/unduliner.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepMP: a deep learning tool to detect DNA base modifications on Nanopore sequencing data 94%
- diffONT: predicting methylation-specific PCR biomarkers based on nanopore sequencing data for clinical application 94%
- Deep5hmC: Predicting genome-wide 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine landscape via a multimodal deep learning model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MethylBERT: A Transformer-based model for read-level DNA methylation pattern identification and tumour deconvolution 94%
- Systematic benchmarking of tools for CpG methylation detection from Nanopore sequencing 94%
- Rockfish: A Transformer-based Model for Accurate 5-Methylcytosine Prediction from Nanopore Sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and methylation on human cell lines with nanopore sequencing 94%
- Haplotype-aware variant calling enables high accuracy in nanopore long-reads using deep neural networks 94%
- Uncalled4 improves nanopore DNA and RNA modification detection via fast and accurate signal alignment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA methylation calling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing: a survey and human epigenome-wide evaluation 93%
- COCOA: Coordinate covariation analysis of epigenetic heterogeneity 93%
- Predicting Disease-Specific Histone Modifications and Functional Effects of Non-coding Variants by Leveraging DNA Language Models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance comparison and in-silico harmonisation of commercial platforms for DNA methylome analysis by targeted bisulfite sequencing 93%
- Highly-accurate long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome 92%
- Alleloscope: Integrative single cell analysis of allele-specific copy number alterations and chromatin accessibility in cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.