Data-efficient machine learning for the detection of duodenal neoplasia: a multi-centre study
Di Lisio, F.; Soilleux, E. J.; Jaeckle, F.
Show abstract
Background: Machine Learning (ML) has shown promise in histopathological diagnosis, but rare tumours, like duodenal epithelial neoplasms, are challenging because large, labelled datasets are difficult to assemble. We propose a data-efficient ML pipeline for detecting duodenal epithelial neoplasia in whole-slide images. Methods: We assembled a five-hospital dataset of haematoxylin and eosin-stained duodenal biopsy whole slide images (WSIs) at 10x magnification, comprising 8,027 normal and 401 neoplastic biopsies, including adenomas, carcinomas and neuroendocrine tumours. WSIs were divided into patches and encoded using the Hibou-B foundation model. We compared global standardisation with unsupervised site-specific standardisation of patch embeddings. Our pipeline combined principal component analysis, a Gaussian mixture model and a Random Forest classifier. We assessed generalisability using leave-one-hospital-out cross-validation across four hospitals and on an independent test set from a fifth hospital. Results: In leave-one-hospital-out cross-validation, the pipeline achieved a mean accuracy of 90%, sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 83% and an AUC of 0.96. On the external test hospital, it achieved 94% accuracy, 93% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and AUC of 0.97. Site-specific standardisation improved mean cross-validation accuracy by 20 percentage points compared with global standardisation, while the Gaussian mixture pipeline improved accuracy by 12 percentage points compared with mean pooling of patch embeddings. Conclusions: We present a data-efficient ML approach for detecting duodenal epithelial neoplasia from WSIs. Strong performance was maintained across hospitals and on an independent external test cohort despite the limited number of neoplastic training cases, supporting the feasibility of foundation-model-based approaches for rare histopathological diagnoses.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 93%
- Automated Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma Grade Classification with Prognostic Significance 90%
- LIMPACAT : Multi-Omics Attention Transformer for Immune Prediction in Liver Cancer Using Whole-Slide Imaging 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A user-friendly tool for cloud-based whole slide image segmentation, with examples from renal histopathology 92%
- Extraction of Crohn's Disease Clinical Phenotypes from Clinical Text Using Natural Language Processing 91%
- Multi-resolution deep learning characterizestertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- VISTA: Virtual ImmunoSTAining for pancreatic disease quantification in murine cohorts 94%
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 92%
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards a Clinically-based Common Coordinate Framework for the Human Gut Cell Atlas - The Gut Models 91%
- Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs 91%
- ARDSFlag: An NLP/Machine Learning Algorithm to Visualize and Detect High-Probability ARDS Admissions Independent of Provider Recognition and Billing Codes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Segmentation of Hepatic Vessels and Lobules in Whole-Slide Images Using U-Net Models 92%
- Machine-learning-based determination of sex-related bladder cancer biomarkers 88%
- BC-Predict: Mining of signal biomarkers and multilevel validation of cascade classifier for early-stage breast cancer subtyping and prognosis 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.