"The further along I get the more I feel like growth is possible": lived-experience narratives of the shape of recovery in borderline personality disorder 
Torres, V.; McAfee, T. M.; Tein, P.; Alario, A. A.; Luo, W.; Foss, K.; Fineberg, S. K.; Nelson, S. M.
Show abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has traditionally been viewed as one of the most chronic psychiatric disorders. Although longitudinal studies have demonstrated promising rates of symptomatic remission, recovery and other clinical outcome measures often remain comparatively low. Qualitative research offers an important perspective on how individuals with BPD may extend a more representative view of improvement and change. We collected narratives from 41 participants with a self-reported diagnosis of BPD and analyzed them using thematic analysis. Its national, virtual recruitment approach enabled a relatively large qualitative sample diverse in gender identity, age, U.S. geographic region, treatment history, and current clinical severity, extending the range of perspectives represented in prior work. Three central themes were identified. The first, Differing attitudes toward language, reflected participantsexperiences of recovery language as paradoxically both validating and stigmatizing. While individual language preferences varied, participants generally converged on a sharedunderstanding of what recovery meant to them. The second, Recovery as a dynamic and relational process, described recovery as nonlinear, effortful, and closely tied to interpersonal experiences. The third, Crossroads and uneven change over time, highlighted the role of personal agency, critical decision points in seeking treatment, and the persistence of internal distress even as behavioral symptoms improve. Findings from this study both replicate and extend existing qualitative research by discussing how individuals with BPD understand recovery in ways that may not be captured by traditional clinical outcome measures. These results emphasize the importance of incorporating lived-experience perspectives when defining recovery and setting treatment goals.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 94%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 93%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 94%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 94%
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review of the Etiology and Neurobiology of Intermittent Explosive Disorder 92%
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 92%
- Prevalence and Predictors of General Psychiatric Disorders and Loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Results from the Understanding Society UKHLS 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 94%
- Longitudinal associations between perceived stress and anhedonia during psychotherapy 93%
- Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder following Childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.