A sample-to-identification workflow to monitor animal and plant biodiversity using metabarcoding and real time analysis
Wange, L. E.; Prado-Martinez, J.; Alentorn-Moron, P.; Marques-Bonet, T.; Juan, D.; Lizano, E.
Show abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a transformative tool for biodiversity monitoring, offering a non-invasive means to detect and identify species across various ecosystems. However, despite its potential, current eDNA methodologies have significant limitations, including limited sensitivity, restriction to a specific taxonomic group, lengthy processing times, the need for specialized laboratory conditions and equipment, as well as computational bottlenecks in equipment, connectivity, and algorithms. Overcoming these limitations is crucial for the real-time monitoring of a high number of taxa in field-based scenarios. Here we present an integrated eDNA workflow from extraction to data analysis that mitigates several of these challenges through several technical innovations. Our approach adapts the Tagsteady protocol to Nanopore sequencing, integrates multiplex PCR for simultaneous plant and animal detection, and introduces RTBioScan, a real-time analysis pipeline employing hierarchical basecalling and OTU-level consensus generation to achieve high-accuracy taxonomic assignments during sequencing. Using a single set of universal primers, we integrate metabarcoding and barcoding into a cohesive protocol, utilizing universal markers for both animals and plants (cytochrome oxidase 1 region, COI, and Internal Transcribed Spacer 2, ITS2). This comprehensive approach can detect and identify a broad spectrum of species, from individual organisms to entire communities in a single workflow.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Capture probe, metabarcoding, or shotgun sequencing: which best reflects local vegetation? 94%
- Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding 94%
- Explainable Multimodal Machine Learning Using Combined Environmental DNA and Biogeographic Features for Ecosystem Biomonitoring 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries 96%
- Watered-down biodiversity? A comparison of metabarcoding results from DNA extracted from matched water and bulk tissue biomonitoring samples 94%
- High-throughput DNA extraction and cost-effective miniaturized metagenome and amplicon library preparation of soil samples for DNA sequencing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The bacterial hitchhiker's guide to COI: Universal primer-based COI capture probes fail to exclude bacterial DNA, but 16S capture leaves metazoa behind 94%
- From short to long reads: enhanced protist diversity profiling via Nanopore metabarcoding 93%
- Maximizing the reliability and the number of species assignments in metabarcoding studies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.