Developing a social vulnerability index from real-world electronic health records using natural language processing
Tirkkonen, A.; Khan, E.; Kaijansinkko, J.; Haapanen, M.; Koivunen, K.; Peltola, A. A.; Niemela, M.; Hoogendijk, E.; Lin, J.; Jylhava, J.; Von Bonsdorff, M. B.
Show abstract
Background: Social vulnerability is associated with adverse health outcomes, but existing social vulnerability indices often rely on cohort-based and self-reported data, potentially limiting their population-level applicability. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an SVI from routinely collected electronic health records (EHRs) using natural language processing (NLP) and examine its association with mortality and healthcare utilization. Method: EHR data from 193,629 individuals aged 35 to102 from the Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland between years 2010 and 2023 were used in this study. A 6 item SVI (total score 0 to 6) was developed from free-text clinical notes using deep-learning-based NLP. SVI scores were calculated at baseline and annually for individuals. Associations between baseline SVI and all cause mortality and healthcare utilization were assessed over 12-year follow-up using Cox and count models. Results: The mean baseline SVI among all participants was 0.35 (range 0 to 6). Women had higher SVI (0.39) than men (0.32, p<0.001). SVI increased with age. One unit increase in SVI was associated with a higher risk of mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (1.21 to 1.24), a higher odds of using healthcare services (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.20; 95% CI): 1.19 to 1.21) and a greater healthcare service use (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.07). Discussion: An index capturing multiple domains of social vulnerability can be derived from EHRs using NLP. Higher SVI was associated with increased mortality and healthcare utilization. These findings support the potential of EHR data for assessing social vulnerability and related health risks.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping the quality of Norwegian health information - Does it facilitate informed choices? 92%
- Back to normal? The health care situation of home care receivers across Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on health 92%
- Pandemic trends in health care use: From the hospital bed to the general practitioner with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consensus study of risk factors and symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) using biomedical literature and social media data 92%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 92%
- Health Communication Through News Media During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: A Digital Topic Modeling Approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: A mixed-methods study 91%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 91%
- Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes in Oman during COVID19: Frontline vs Non-frontline Healthcare Workers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Tools for the Passive Monitoring of Depression: A Systematic Review of Methods 92%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 90%
- Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Augmenting Fact and Date of Death in Electronic Health Records using Internet Media Sources: A Validation Study from Two Large Healthcare Systems 93%
- Obtaining prevalence estimates of COVID-19: A model to inform decision-making 89%
- Estimating the Effect of Social Distancing Interventions on COVID-19 in the United States 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.