Back

Preservation of intracellular protein-protein interactions in archived cytological specimens: Optimization of preanalytical variables for in situ proximity ligation assay

Dahlstrom, C. M.; Hirsch, J. M.; Lof, L.

2026-10-07 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.10.06.757074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Context: Cytological specimens allow minimally invasive, repeated sampling for diagnosis and molecular testing. However, cytology biobanking protocols have primarily been optimized for morphology, and the effects of preanalytical handling and storage on intracellular proteins remain unclear. Objective: To assess how fixation, staining, storage temperature, and duration affect intracellular protein preservation in cytological specimens and to identify conditions suitable for in situ proximity ligation assay (isPLA). Design: Human cancer cell lines were processed under different preanalytical conditions. Intracellular proteins and protein protein interactions were assessed by isPLA, fluorescence microscopy, and quantitative image analysis. Slides were stored at room temperature or minus 20 Celsius, with or without MayGrunwaldGiemsa (MGG) staining. Results: Storage temperature had the greatest effect on protein signal. Unstained slides stored at minus 20 Celsius retained strong signals for up to 24 months, whereas room temperature storage reduced detectable protein interactions by approximately 95%. MGG staining further reduced signal intensity during prolonged storage. Nevertheless, stained slides remained suitable for isPLA when staining, microscopic evaluation, destaining, and antibody labeling were completed on the same day. Prolonged room temperature storage of stained slides caused loss of antigenicity, increased autofluorescence, and false negative findings. Conclusions: Low temperature storage and standardized preanalytical handling preserve intracellular protein signals in cytological specimens. These conditions support reliable single cell protein profiling of archived samples and their use in biomarker research and translational pathology.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.