Back

Baseline growth rate shapes pollutant impacts in aquatic environments: Evidence from antibiotic responses in the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis

Feng, G.; Duan, Z.; Hu, C.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.-Z.

2026-10-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.10.06.756710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hormesis is an important consideration in chemical risk assessment across most aquatic environments. Evidence suggests that hormetic responses are shaped by organismal physiological processes. Accordingly, predictions of hormesis under environmentally realistic conditions should account for physiological traits. Yet the role of these traits remains largely unexplored. This study investigated how baseline growth rate modulates antibiotic responses in the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis and the underlying mechanisms. Results showed that at an antibiotic concentration of 200 ng L-1 (representing environmental concentration levels), slow-growing Microcystis populations exhibited an obvious growth enhancement more than 4-fold greater than that of fast-growing populations, and this enhancement was positively correlated with cellular reserves. A baseline growth rate below 0.19 day-1 emerged as the threshold below which hormetic responses were consistently observed. This study provides pioneering insights into how organisms' physiological states influence pollutant-induced hormetic responses in aquatic environments. Our findings point to a central principle for extrapolation that laboratory-derived toxicological responses may not translate directly to the field unless key physiological traits of the organisms are explicitly considered. In this regard, baseline growth rate and energy reserves may be key physiological traits for reliably predicting toxic effects at the population level. This study also makes an initial attempt to conceptualize a physiology-anchored framework for strengthening risk assessment of low-level emerging contaminants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.