Back

Dynamic near-term risk prediction of clinically significant immune-related adverse events using longitudinal electronic health records

Gong, L.; Agyekum, A.; Aswani, N.; Nieva, H. R.; Hur, C.

2026-10-08 health informatics
10.64898/2026.10.06.26364907 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a dynamic model that repeatedly estimates the 30-day risk of a first grade [≥]2 immune-related adverse event (irAE) during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Materials and Methods: Adults initiating ICI therapy during 2015-2022 comprised the development cohort; 2023 initiators formed a nonoverlapping internal temporal evaluation cohort. Every 21 days during the first treatment year, models used available EHR information to predict a first structured phenotype-defined above Grade 2 irAE during the next 30 days. Evaluation included pooled and within-landmark discrimination, precision-recall performance, calibration, and patient-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals. Feature-state ablations and alternative update schedules examined the contribution of dynamic information. Results: Development included 1,522 patients and 18,744 evaluable landmarks; temporal evaluation included 526 patients and 6,263 landmarks, of which 184 were positive (2.94%). The multiscale XGBoost model achieved pooled AUROC 0.716 (95% CI, 0.676-0.755), AUPRC 0.067, within-landmark AUROC 0.672 (95% CI, 0.631-0.716), Brier score 0.0281, and log loss 0.1245. The time-aware baseline achieved AUROC 0.631 and within-landmark AUROC 0.536. Updated treatment exposure and laboratory trajectories accounted for most of the gain. A complete-state extension achieved AUROC 0.719 and AUPRC 0.073. The 21-day schedule had the highest discrimination among tested cadences. Conclusion: Longitudinal EHR updating improved near-term irAE prediction beyond pretreatment characteristics and treatment time. Phenotype adjudication and independent evaluation of calibration, transportability, and clinical utility are needed before implementation

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.