Sense and Sensibility: Sensible Quality Control and Data Decision-Making in Passive Sensing Data for Adolescent Substance Use Risk Prediction
Hong, A.; Diaz, J. L.; Kennedy, T. M.; Wang, F. L.
Show abstract
Background: Passively collected smartphone and wearable data, combined with genomic information, may enable scalable early identification of youth who are at risk for substance use disorder. However, heterogeneous data collected in naturalistic settings limit researcher control over data quality, requiring substantial preprocessing. Data cleaning and feature engineering decisions can meaningfully influence analytic outcomes yet are often minimally described or omitted in published work. Objectives: We provide rationales and recommendations for common preprocessing challenges in passive sensing research, including establishing inclusion criteria when "outliers" may reflect true behavioral variability, analyzing differences across smartphone operating systems, handling observations collected outside protocol windows, and engineering features for machine learning applications. Methods: We illustrate principled approaches to these challenges using smartphone and Fitbit data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD). The sample was drawn from the available half of the year-4 follow-up (data release 5.1; N = 4,754; ages 13-14). Results: Extreme outlying observations were concentrated among low-engagement participants with few observed days. Smartphone usage among Apple users appeared under-recorded relative to Android users when compared with self-report measures. Fitbit-derived behavior differed systematically between observations collected within versus outside protocol windows. We also identified potential errors in the study's default preprocessing pipeline. Conclusion: We recommend prioritizing person-level inclusion criteria that preserve meaningful behavioral variability, examining temporal distributions rather than assuming observations are exchangeable, and thoroughly investigating and reporting data quality issues. Although illustrated using the ABCD Study, these principles broadly apply to research using smartphones, wearables, and other digital data sources.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How can digital citizen science approaches improve ethical smartphone use surveillance among youth: traditional surveys versus ecological momentary assessments 93%
- Conversational, Longitudinal, Ecological Assessment (CLEA): Exploring a new AI-driven method for qualitative data collection in a behavioural health context 91%
- Developing and validating an explainable digital mortality prediction tool for extremely preterm infants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 91%
- Uncovering social states in healthy and clinical populations using digital phenotyping and Hidden Markov Models 90%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digitally Diagnosing Multiple Developmental Delays using Crowdsourcing fused with Machine Learning: A Research Protocol 91%
- Design and rationale of the Longitudinal Evaluation of Norms and Networks Study (LENNS): A cluster-randomized trial assessing the impact of a norms-centric intervention on exclusive toilet use and maintenance in peri-urban communities of Tamil Nadu 91%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective 90%
- An online mental health informed physical activity intervention for emergency service workers and their families: A stepped-wedge trial 89%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.